Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review consistent yield curve stress testing: from Nelson-Siegel to machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Abramov, Vilen [1 ]
Atchison, Christopher [2 ]
Bian, Zhengye [3 ]
机构
[1] 420 Queens Rd,Unit 10, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA
[2] 2238 Beaucatcher Lane, Charlotte, NC 28270 USA
[3] 3078 Clairmont Rd,Apartment 536, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION | 2021年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
machine learning; artificial neural networks (ANNs); principal component analysis (PCA); Nelson-Siegel (NS); yield curve; stress testing;
D O I
10.21314/JRMV.2021.005
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Following the global financial crisis of 2007-9, the regulators established a stress testing framework known as Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The regulatory stress scenarios in this framework are macroeconomic and do not define stress values for all the relevant risk factors. In particular, only three Treasury rates are captured in these scenarios. CCAR scenarios can be complemented by defining stress values for the missing risk factors. The Treasury rates corresponding to different nodes are highly correlated. Hence, the changes in the three Treasury rates defined in the regulatory scenarios may impact the other rates. This paper focuses on CCAR-consistent Treasury yield curve stress testing. We assessed via backtesting three modeling approaches that allow us to "build" the stressed curves under CCAR scenarios: the Nelson-Siegel approach, principal component analysis (PCA) and the artificial neural network approach. The PCA approach fits the scenario-generation problem better than Nelson-Siegel because it explicitly takes into consideration correlation among historical changes in rates corresponding to different nodes, while the artificial neural network approach allows us to directly link the changes in the three Treasury rates to the changes in the other rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 33
页数:33
相关论文
共 8 条