Estimation of production technology when the objective is to maximize return to the outlay

被引:23
|
作者
Kumbhakar, Subal C. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Econ, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
Distance function; Transformation function; Translog function; Technical inefficiency; DISTANCE FUNCTION; EFFICIENCY; DOLLAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.015
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper deals with estimation of production technology where endogeneous choice of input and output variables is explicitly recognized To address this endogeneity issue we assume that producers maximize return to the outlay We start from a flexible (translog) transformation function with a single output and multiple inputs and show how the first-order conditions of maximizing return to the outlay can be used to come up with an estimating equation that does not suffer from the econometric endogeneity problem although the output and input variables are chosen endogenously This is because the regressors in this estimating equation are in ratio forms which are uncorrelated with the error term under the assumption that producers maximize return to the outlay The analysis is then extended to the multiple outputs and multiple Inputs case with technical inefficiency Although the estimating equations in both single and multiple output cases are neither production nor distance functions they can be estimated in a straightforward manner using the standard stochastic frontier technique without worrying about endogeneity of the regressors Thus we provide a rationale for estimating the technology parameters consistently using an econometric model which requires data on only input and output quantities (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 176
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation and decomposition of inefficiency when producers maximize return to the outlay: an application to Norwegian fishing trawlers
    Subal C. Kumbhakar
    Frank Asche
    Ragnar Tveteras
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 40 : 307 - 321
  • [2] Estimation and decomposition of inefficiency when producers maximize return to the outlay: an application to Norwegian fishing trawlers
    Kumbhakar, Subal C.
    Asche, Frank
    Tveteras, Ragnar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (03) : 307 - 321
  • [3] Analysing wage differentials when workers maximize the return to human capital investment
    Perez Villadoniga, Maria Jose
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Ana
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (42) : 4196 - 4208
  • [4] Maximize to Explore: One Objective Function Fusing Estimation, Planning, and Exploration
    Liu, Zhihan
    Lu, Miao
    Xiong, Wei
    Zhong, Han
    Hu, Hao
    Zhang, Shenao
    Zheng, Sirui
    Yang, Zhuoran
    Wang, Zhaoran
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [5] Employers' perspective: When a return to work is the objective for persons with reduced mobility
    Jakobsen, Klara
    Svendsen, Elin
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2013, 44 (02): : 145 - 153
  • [6] ESTIMATION OF EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY ON PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY
    ZIND, RG
    DOUTRIAUX, J
    [J]. ACTUALITE ECONOMIQUE, 1978, 54 (01): : 104 - 110
  • [7] ESTIMATION OF MULTIPERIOD EXPECTED RATES OF RETURN WHEN INVESTMENT RELATIVES ARE LOGNORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
    KARSON, MJ
    CHENG, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1985, 3 (02) : 140 - 148
  • [8] THE APPLICATION OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY FOR THE PRODUCTION TIME ESTIMATION
    Opetuk, Tihomir
    Cosic, Predrag
    [J]. ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2008 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM, 2008, : 991 - 992
  • [9] APPLICATION OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY FOR PRODUCTION TIME ESTIMATION
    Opetuk, Tihomir
    Cosic, Predrag
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF FAMENA, 2012, 36 (03) : 55 - 68
  • [10] Estimation of maize straw production and appropriate straw return rate in China
    Liu, Wanmao
    Liu, Yuee
    Liu, Guangzhou
    Xie, Ruizhi
    Ming, Bo
    Yang, Yunshan
    Guo, Xiaoxia
    Wang, Keru
    Xue, Jun
    Wang, Yonghong
    Zhao, Rulang
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Wang, Yongjun
    Bian, Shaofeng
    Ren, Hong
    Zhao, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Peng
    Chang, Jianzhi
    Zhang, Guohe
    Liu, Jiayou
    Yuan, Liuzheng
    Zhao, Haiyan
    Shi, Lei
    Zhang, Lili
    Yu, Lin
    Gao, Julin
    Yu, Xiaofang
    Wang, Zhigang
    Shen, Liguo
    Ji, Ping
    Yang, Shuzong
    Zhang, Zhongdong
    Xue, Jiquan
    Ma, Xiangfeng
    Wang, Xiuquan
    Lu, Tingqi
    Dong, Benchun
    Li, Gang
    Ma, Baoxin
    Li, Jinqin
    Deng, Xiufeng
    Liu, Yonghong
    Yang, Qin
    Jia, Chunlan
    Chen, Xianping
    Fu, Hua
    Li, Shaokun
    Hou, Peng
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 328