G-CSF primary prophylaxis use and outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia: a scoping review

被引:7
|
作者
Campbell, Kim [1 ]
Chadha, Nidhi [2 ]
Dimri, Seema [2 ]
Wang, Weijia [3 ]
Li, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Sandoz Inc, Oncol Med Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Value & Access, Hyderabad, India
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
G-CSF; primary prophylaxis; intermediate FN risk; real-world; prophylaxis patterns; FN incidence; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; REAL-WORLD; FEC-D; PEGFILGRASTIM PROPHYLAXIS; GROWTH-FACTORS; SINGLE-CENTER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/17474086.2022.2093712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and several patients receiving chemotherapy are at intermediate risk of developing FN. However, the guidelines remain less clear regarding the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for this population and insights about real-world prophylaxis patterns and FN outcomes are needed. Areas covered This scoping review summarizes the variability in real-world G-CSF prophylaxis treatment patterns, incidence of FN, and associated outcomes among patients receiving chemotherapy at intermediate risk of FN. G-CSF PP use varied across the included studies (N = 23). Overall, there was a trend for reduced FN incidence among patients who received G-CSF PP vs. those who did not. G-CSF PP was also associated with a lower incidence of FN-related dose delays and reductions and fewer hospitalization days. Gaps in the literature of real-world studies exist, particularly around incorporating FN risk factor assessment, patient-reported outcomes, and health economic outcomes. Expert opinion Further studies are warranted to determine the impact of G-CSF PP use on clinical, quality of life, and economic outcomes in patients with intermediate FN risk, which could optimize care for this subgroup of patients, resulting in better population-based FN-related outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 633
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing febrile neutropenia outcomes in patients receiving primary versus secondary prophylactic G-CSF treatment therapy with intermediate neutropenic risk chemotherapy regimens
    Goodin, Claire
    Ratliff, Patrick
    Cottingham, Lauren
    Shely, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (07) : 1568 - 1572
  • [2] A probability/risk matrix of febrile neutropenia to select patients for G-CSF primary prophylaxis
    Ramchandani Vaswani, A.
    Faez, L.
    Selvi Miralles, M.
    Antonio-Rebollo, M.
    Font Puig, C.
    Espinosa Arranz, J.
    Biosca, M.
    Vicente Rubio, E.
    Jimenez Fonseca, P.
    Carmona-Bayonas, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S275 - S276
  • [3] History of chronic comorbidity and risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients not receiving G-CSF prophylaxis
    Chao, C.
    Page, J. H.
    Yang, S. -J.
    Rodriguez, R.
    Huynh, J.
    Chia, V. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (09) : 1821 - 1829
  • [4] G-CSF prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and infections after chemotherapy
    Link, H.
    ONKOLOGE, 2014, 20 (03): : 268 - 270
  • [5] The occurrence and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer not receiving primary G-CSF prophylaxis
    Hutajulu, Susanna Hilda
    Oktariani, Siswi
    Sunggoro, Agus Jati
    Bintoro, Bagas Suryo
    Astari, Yufi Kartika
    Wiranata, Juan Adrian
    Widodo, Irianiwati
    Ekowati, Anita
    Hardianti, Mardiah Suci
    Taroeno-Hariadi, Kartika Widayati
    Kurnianda, Johan
    Purwanto, Ibnu
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [6] RISK OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AND USE OF G-CSF PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS IN NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING R-CHOP-21
    Haioun, C.
    Jaeger, U.
    Lugtenburg, P.
    Pettengell, R.
    Principe, F.
    Rossi, F.
    Salar, A.
    Schwenkglenks, M.
    Verhoef, G.
    Edmundson, S.
    Bacon, P.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 93 : 105 - 105
  • [7] Real-world cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF biosimilars in patients at intermediate/high risk of febrile neutropenia
    Cornes, Paul
    Kelton, John
    Liu, Rongzhe
    Zaidi, Omer
    Stephens, Jennifer
    Yang, Jingyan
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (16) : 1979 - 1996
  • [8] Integration of G-CSF in the prophylaxis and treatment of febrile neutropenia
    Siegmund, R
    Illiger, HJ
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 1996, 91 (02) : 82 - 88
  • [9] USE OF G-CSF PROPHYLAXIS AND INCIDENCE OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AMONG MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY IN TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODELS
    Hanau, A.
    Weycker, D.
    Lonshteyn, A.
    Shah, N.
    Lawrence, T.
    Hatfield, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S50 - S50
  • [10] Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: primary G-CSF prophylaxis indicated during docetaxel cycles
    van Dooijeweert, C.
    van der Wall, E.
    Baas, I. O.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 77 (09): : 310 - 316