Water valuation and the application of Declared Preferences methods: Contingent Valuation vs a Choice Experiment approach

被引:0
|
作者
Alfranca, Oscar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Barcelona, Spain
来源
AGUA Y TERRITORIO | 2020年 / 15期
关键词
Declared Preferences; Revealed Preferences; Experiments of election; Choice Experiments; ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; NONMARKET VALUATION; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; NONRESPONSE RATES; MIXED LOGIT; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; QUALITATIVE METHODS; GENERAL-POPULATION;
D O I
10.17561/at.15.4726
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In the Declared Preferences methods (DP) questions are developed to different persons in order to establish alternative hypothetical scenarios. The most important methods which are based in a Declared Preferences hypothesis are the Contingent Valuation (CV) method and those which are based in a Choice Experiment (CE) Approach. In DP methods questions are used in order to establish preferences over hypothetical scenarios, which could be different (either goods or services). Each alternative is described through different attributes, and the answers can be used in order to determine the different preferences. Some very relevant methods which are based in the DP hypothesis can be found which are based in CV and CE approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valuation of Access to Irrigation Water in Rural Ethiopia: Application of Choice Experiment and Contingent Valuation Methods
    Mekonnen, Alemu
    Gebreegziabher, Zenebe
    Beyene, Abebe D.
    Hagos, Fitsum
    [J]. WATER ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [2] A comparison of stated preferences methods for the valuation of natural resources: the case of contingent valuation and choice experiment
    Bostan, Y.
    Ardakani, A. Fatahi
    Sani, M. Fehresti
    Sadeghinia, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 17 (09) : 4031 - 4046
  • [3] A comparison of stated preferences methods for the valuation of natural resources: the case of contingent valuation and choice experiment
    Y. Bostan
    A. Fatahi Ardakani
    M. Fehresti Sani
    M. Sadeghinia
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 17 : 4031 - 4046
  • [4] A choice experiment approach to the valuation of mortality
    Tsuge, T
    Kishimoto, A
    Takeuchi, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2005, 31 (01) : 73 - 95
  • [5] A Choice Experiment Approach to the Valuation of Mortality
    Takahiro Tsuge
    Atsuo Kishimoto
    Kenji Takeuchi
    [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2005, 31 : 73 - 95
  • [6] CONTINGENT VALUATION AND SOCIAL CHOICE
    MCFADDEN, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (04) : 689 - 708
  • [7] Contingent valuation and collective choice
    Schläpfer, F
    Hanley, N
    [J]. KYKLOS, 2006, 59 (01) : 115 - 135
  • [8] A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Berrens, RP
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (01) : 252 - 266
  • [9] Valuation of IT courses - A contingent valuation method approach
    Liao, Chao-ning
    Chiang, LiChun
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2008, 11 (01): : 238 - 247
  • [10] Distributional preferences in contingent valuation surveys
    Johnson, LT
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (04) : 475 - 487