Do Urban Social Enterprises Benefit from Agglomeration? Evidence from Four UK Cities

被引:11
|
作者
Pinch, Steven [1 ]
Sunley, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Geog & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Social enterprise; Agglomeration; Urban; Institutions; Networks; CLUSTERS; KNOWLEDGE; BUZZ; PIPELINES; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1080/00343404.2015.1034667
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PINCH S. and SUNLEY P. Do urban social enterprises benefit from agglomeration? Evidence from four UK cities, Regional Studies. This paper examines the relevance of clustering theory for an understanding of the location of social enterprises (SEs). This is accomplished through an analysis of the extent to which managers of SEs in four major UK cities perceive themselves to benefit from agglomeration effects. The paper concentrates on two broad sets of agglomeration processes: the first is Marshallian externalities and Porter's cluster processes; and the second set includes urbanization economies and local institutional relationships. The study suggests the key benefits of agglomeration to SEs are that it enables access to demand for SE goods and services together with institutional support, funding and commercial contracts, as well as access to both formal and informal networks that can provide a wide range of knowledge and mutual support. It was, however, difficult to find direct evidence to support the importance of the Marshall-Arrow-Romer (MAR)-type spillovers related to labour market pooling, the efficient procurement of indirect inputs or localized knowledge spillovers.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1301
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do rural migrants benefit from labor market agglomeration economies? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Yang, Guangliang
    Li, Lixing
    Fu, Shihe
    [J]. GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (03) : 910 - 931
  • [2] Enterprise heterogeneity, agglomeration model, and urban exports: Evidence from Chinese cities and micro enterprises
    Zhang, Wenwu
    Li, Ruru
    Zuo, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 30 (08): : 1207 - 1230
  • [3] Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities
    Smith, DM
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2004, 41 (11) : 2273 - 2275
  • [4] Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities
    DeMarco, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2002, 68 (01) : 101 - 102
  • [5] Urban inequality evidence from four cities
    Conrad, CA
    [J]. FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2002, 8 (02) : 223 - 226
  • [6] Innovation agglomeration and urban hierarchy: evidence from Chinese cities
    Fan, Fei
    Dai, Shangze
    Zhang, Keke
    Ke, Haiqian
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (54) : 6300 - 6318
  • [7] Industrial structure and urban agglomeration: evidence from Chinese cities
    Li, Zhi
    Ding, Chengri
    Niu, Yi
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (01): : 191 - 218
  • [8] Industrial structure and urban agglomeration: evidence from Chinese cities
    Zhi Li
    Chengri Ding
    Yi Niu
    [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2019, 63 : 191 - 218
  • [9] Do low-paid workers benefit from the urban escalator? Evidence from British cities
    Velthuis, Sanne
    Sissons, Paul
    Berkeley, Nigel
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2019, 56 (08) : 1664 - 1680
  • [10] Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities.
    Wilson, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2002, 92 (02) : 365 - 367