Value of Information Analysis for Research Decisions-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force

被引:84
|
作者
Fenwick, Elisabeth [1 ]
Steuten, Lotte [2 ]
Knies, Saskia [3 ]
Ghabri, Salah [4 ]
Basu, Anirban [5 ]
Murray, James F. [6 ]
Koffijberg, Hendrik [7 ]
Strong, Mark [8 ]
Schmidler, Gillian D. Sanders [9 ,10 ]
Rothery, Claire [11 ]
机构
[1] Pharmerit Int, Enterprise House,Innovat Way, Oxford YO10 5NQ, England
[2] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[3] Natl Hlth Care Inst, Zorginst Nederland, Diemen, Netherlands
[4] French Natl Author Hlth, Paris, France
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Comparat Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ CHOICE Inst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Eli Lilly & Co, Global Patient Outcomes & Real World Evidence, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[7] Univ Twente, Tech Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[8] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[10] Duke Univ, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC USA
[11] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
decision making; expected net benefit of sampling; expected value of information; expected value of perfect information; value of information; value of research; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EXPECTED VALUE; REIMBURSEMENT DECISIONS; SAMPLE INFORMATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; POTENTIAL-VALUE; FRAMEWORK; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Healthcare resource allocation decisions made under conditions of uncertainty may turn out to be suboptimal. In a resource constrained system in which there is a fixed budget, these suboptimal decisions will result in health loss. Consequently, there may be value in reducing uncertainty, through the collection of new evidence, to make better resource allocation decisions. This value can be quantified using a value of information (VOI) analysis. This report, from the ISPOR VOI Task Force, introduces VOI analysis, defines key concepts and terminology, and outlines the role of VOI for supporting decision making, including the steps involved in undertaking and interpreting VOI analyses. The report is specifically aimed at those tasked with making decisions about the adoption of healthcare or the funding of healthcare research. The report provides a number of recommendations for good practice when planning, undertaking, or reviewing the results of VOI analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 150
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Rothery, Claire
    Strong, Mark
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    Basu, Anirban
    Ghabri, Salah
    Knies, Saskia
    Murray, James F.
    Schmidler, Gillian D. Sanders
    Steuten, Lotte
    Fenwick, Elisabeth
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (03) : 277 - 286
  • [2] A Step Closer to Better Research Prioritization? The ISPOR Value of Information Task Force Reports
    Fleurence, Rachael L.
    Selby, Joe V.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (03) : 287 - 288
  • [3] Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: Report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices - budget impact analysis
    Mauskopf, Josephine A.
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Caro, Jaime
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Nuijten, Mark
    Orlewska, Ewa
    Watkins, John
    Trueman, Paul
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (05) : 336 - 347
  • [4] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Thokala, Praveen
    Devlin, Nancy
    Marsh, Kevin
    Baltussen, Rob
    Boysen, Meindert
    Kalo, Zoltan
    Longrenn, Thomas
    Mussen, Filip
    Peacock, Stuart
    Watkins, John
    Ijzerman, Maarten
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [6] Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Crown, William
    Buyukkaramikli, Nasuh
    Thokala, Praveen
    Morton, Alec
    Sir, Mustafa Y.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Tosh, Jon
    Padula, William V.
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Wong, Peter K.
    Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [7] Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 298 - 299
  • [8] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Marsh, Kevin
    IJzerman, Maarten
    Thokala, Praveen
    Baltussen, Rob
    Boysen, Meindert
    Kalo, Zoltan
    Lonngren, Thomas
    Mussen, Filip
    Peacock, Stuart
    Watkins, John
    Devlin, Nancy
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [9] Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1
    Caro, J. Jaime
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) : 667 - 677
  • [10] Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1
    Caro, J. Jaime
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (06) : 796 - 803