Investigating the interplay between the attributes of at-fault and not-at-fault drivers and the associated impacts on crash injury occurrence and severity level

被引:12
|
作者
Li, Lu [1 ]
Hasnine, Md. Sami [1 ]
Habib, Khandker M. Nurul [1 ]
Persaud, Bhagwant [2 ]
Shalaby, Amer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, 35 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
at-fault and not-at-fault driver; bivariate binary probit model; bivariate ordered probit model; crash analysis; crash severity; road safety; ORDERED PROBIT MODELS; REAR-END CRASHES; LOGIT MODEL; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/19439962.2016.1237602
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The article proposes a two-staged modelling approach to identify the association between one vehicle's attributes, as well as roadway engineering, environmental and crash characteristics, and the injury severity of occupants in the partnering vehicle in two-vehicle crashes. The modelling approach uses a bivariate binary probit model, and crash data for Toronto, to first determine the probability of injury and no injury occurring, followed by the use of a bivariate ordered probit model to investigate the conditional probability of the specific severity level. Vehicles in two-vehicle crashes are categorized as "not-atfault" (NAF) or "at-fault" (AF) and their occupants also categorized as such. The findings demonstrate that the modelling approach used in this study can reveal meaningful insights by improving understanding of how the same attribute could behave differently for NAF and AF vehicles. For example, factors found to be associated with increased probability of more severe injuries of NAF vehicle occupants are inattentive driving, left-turn movement, heavy vehicle type of the AF vehicle, and angle and rear-end impact type; conversely, for AF vehicles, their probability of more severe injury is positively associated with inattentive driving and heavy vehicle type of the NAF vehicle, and angle and approaching impact type.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 456
页数:18
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Modeling and comparing injury severity of at-fault and not at-fault drivers in crashes
    Duddu, Venkata R.
    Penmetsa, Praveena
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 120 : 55 - 63
  • [2] Examining Injury Severity of Not-At-Fault Drivers in Two-Vehicle Crashes
    Penmetsa, Praveena
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S.
    Duddu, Venkata R.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2659) : 164 - 173
  • [3] Crash injury severity analyses with multilevel thresholds of change modelling approach for at-fault out-of-state drivers
    Yu, Rongjie
    Zheng, Yin
    Qin, Yong
    Abdel-Aty, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2020, 12 (09) : 1164 - 1181
  • [4] Incorporating risky driving behaviour in the injury severity analysis of at-fault and not-at-fault novice driver involved crashes: a correlated random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means
    Sun, Zhiyuan
    Xie, Zhiming
    Wang, Duo
    Wang, Zehao
    Wang, Jianyu
    Gu, Xin
    Lu, Huapu
    Chen, Yanyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2024, : 183 - 195
  • [5] Investigating risk factors associated with pedestrian crash occurrence and injury severity in Texas
    Rahman, Mashrur
    Kockelman, Kara M.
    Perrine, Kenneth A.
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 23 (05) : 283 - 289
  • [6] Analysis of factors that influence injury severity of single and multivehicle crashes involving at-fault older drivers: A random parameters logit with heterogeneity in means and variances approach
    Dzinyela, Richard
    Adanu, Emmanuel Kofi
    Lord, Dominique
    Islam, Samantha
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 22
  • [7] Modeling endogeneity between motorcyclist injury severity and at-fault status by applying a Bayesian simultaneous random-parameters model with a recursive structure
    Chang, Fangrong
    Yasmin, Shamsunnahar
    Huang, Helai
    Chan, Alan H. S.
    Haque, Md. Mazharul
    ANALYTIC METHODS IN ACCIDENT RESEARCH, 2022, 36