A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems

被引:101
|
作者
Kutucuoglu, KY [1 ]
Hamali, J
Irani, Z
Sharp, JM
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
[2] Brunel Univ, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[3] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
performance measurement; maintenance; quality function deployment;
D O I
10.1108/01443570110358521
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The role of maintenance in modern manufacturing is becoming ever more important, with companies adopting maintenance as a profit-generating business element. As a result, traditional terms used to describe maintenance such as "necessary evil" seem to be obsolete. It would appear that the aim of the maintenance function is to contribute towards an organisation's profit, clearly bringing the need for maintenance operations to be in harmony with corporate business objectives. As the measurement activity provides the link between the actual output and the desired results, performance measurement systems are crucial to those who have a stake in maintenance, to ensure that they are not in conflict with the overall business needs. This paper looks at the role of performance measurement systems (PMS) in maintenance, with particular reference to developing a new PMS using the quality function deployment (QFD) technique. First, a literature review on performance measurement is presented, in which the key factors for an effective PMS are identified. Second, common PMSs for maintenance are examined. Then, based on the principles of an effective PMS a discussion on PMSs is presented, when applied to the maintenance function. Next, a framework is developed to embrace these key facets, which is followed by a discussion of its practical implications, in the light of its application within a SME.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:173 / 194
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preliminary Framework of Sustainable Maintenance Performance Measurement Systems for Automotive Companies
    Sari, Emelia
    Shaharoun, Awaluddin Bin Mohamed
    Ma'aram, Azanizawati Bt
    MATERIALS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING RESEARCH ADVANCES 1.1, 2014, 845 : 590 - 595
  • [2] A hierarchical framework for the measurement of maintenance efficacy and efficiency using performance indicators
    Galante, G. M.
    Inghilleri, R.
    La Fata, C. M.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 1109 - 1117
  • [3] Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators
    Muchiri, Peter
    Pintelon, Liliane
    Gelders, Ludo
    Martin, Harry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2011, 131 (01) : 295 - 302
  • [4] Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework-using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection.
    Van Horenbeek, Adriaan
    Pintelon, Liliane
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 42 (01): : 33 - 46
  • [5] MANAGING SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
    MARTIN, GN
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1978, 29 (07): : 30 - 33
  • [6] A framework to review performance measurement systems
    Najmi, Manoochehr
    Rigas, John
    Fan, Ip-Shing
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (02) : 109 - 122
  • [7] A PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS DESIGN FRAMEWORK
    Duarte, R.
    Deschamps, F.
    Pinheiro de Lima, E.
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION RESEARCH (ICPR), 2017, : 165 - 170
  • [8] Enabling BPR in Maintenance Through a Performance Measurement System Framework
    K. Y. Kutucuoglu
    J. Hamali
    J. M. Sharp
    Z. Irani
    International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2002, 14 : 33 - 52
  • [9] Enabling BPR in maintenance through a performance measurement system framework
    Kutucuoglu, KY
    Hamali, J
    Sharp, JM
    Irani, Z
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2002, 14 (01): : 33 - 52
  • [10] A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems
    Medori, D
    Steeple, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (5-6) : 520 - 533