An applicability assessment and sensitivity analysis of land use impact models: application of the LANCA model in site-specific conditions

被引:3
|
作者
Terranova, D. [1 ]
Balugani, E. [1 ]
Righi, S. [1 ,2 ]
Marazza, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Ctr Interdipartimentale Ric Sci Ambientali, CIRSA, Via S Alberto 163, I-48123 Ravenna, RA, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Phys, DiFa, Viale B Pichat 6-2, I-40123 Bologna, BO, Italy
来源
关键词
Soil quality indicators; Land use; Impact assessment; Soil erosion; Regionalization; Spatial differentiation; RUSLE; Model applicability; Harmonised LCIA methods; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; DATASET; EROSION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-021-01981-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose In this work, we study a land use impact model with the aim of obtaining spatially differentiated as opposed to default average characterisation factors. In particular, we study the application of LANCA (R), a multi-indicator model with available country average characterisation factors expressing the alteration of the soil quality level of the current land use of one kind with respect to a reference situation. Method To this purpose, we use the LANCA (R) method documentation at a higher spatial resolution and apply all the required elemental steps. From a user perspective, we score the transparency of the method down to the basic methodological references and single out the source of errors that the user may incur when: (i) collecting the input data, (ii) selecting the appropriate soil/land classes and (iii) applying the individual calculation steps. For a greater insight, we couple the source of errors with a sensitivity analysis. Results In the comparison between a site-specific test area and the related country default values, we obtained relevant discrepancies regarding the erosion resistance and the physicochemical filtration of the soil. For example, we find that the erosion resistance potential is -1.06 * 10(-3) kg m(2) a(-1) locally while the country default value is 13.1. We explain differences through the sensitivity analysis and having analysed in depth the underpinned soil erosion equation and the critical steps for its calibration. Together with systematic errors, we find that the method generally implies 9 scarcely guided steps out of 42, and one-third of the basic methodologies are not fully explained or accessible. These factors make the results related to Biotic Production, Mechanical Filtration, Physicochemical Filtration and Groundwater Regeneration user dependent and - in this sense - difficult to replicate. Conclusions From the analysis, we distil 7 main directions for improvement addressed to LANCA (R) and soil models especially in sight of a broader application of a regionalised life cycle impact assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2231
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] An applicability assessment and sensitivity analysis of land use impact models: application of the LANCA model in site-specific conditions
    D. Terranova
    E. Balugani
    S. Righi
    D. Marazza
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 2215 - 2231
  • [2] A conceptual model for site-specific agricultural land-use
    Wiggering, Hubert
    Steinhardt, Uta
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 295 : 42 - 46
  • [3] Baseline study in environmental risk assessment: site-specific model development and application
    Alam, Asifa
    Mahmood, Adeel
    Chaudhry, M. Nawaz
    Ahmad, Sajid Rashid
    Ul Safa, Noor
    Alghamdi, Huda Ahmed
    Alhamdi, Heba Waheeb
    Ullah, Rizwan
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 48 (03) : 80 - 88
  • [4] Site-specific environmental impact assessment as a basis for supplier selections - exemplary application to aluminum
    Schiessl, A.
    Muller, R.
    Volk, R.
    Schultmann, F.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 290
  • [5] Land use impact assessment in the construction sector: an analysis of LCIA models and case study application
    Karen Allacker
    Danielle Maia de Souza
    Serenella Sala
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1799 - 1809
  • [6] Land use impact assessment in the construction sector: an analysis of LCIA models and case study application
    Allacker, Karen
    de Souza, Danielle Maia
    Sala, Serenella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (11): : 1799 - 1809
  • [7] Bayesian Poisson hierarchical models for crash data analysis: Investigating the impact of model choice on site-specific predictions
    Khazraee, S. Hadi
    Johnson, Valen
    Lord, Dominique
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 117 : 181 - 195
  • [8] Regionalization of land use impact models for life cycle assessment: Recommendations for their use on the global scale and their applicability to Brazil
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 60 : 148 - 155
  • [9] Integrating site-specific environmental impact assessment in supplier selection: exemplary application to steel procurement
    Schiessl A.
    Müller R.
    Volk R.
    Zimmer K.
    Breun P.
    Schultmann F.
    Journal of Business Economics, 2020, 90 (9) : 1409 - 1457
  • [10] The use of Rayleigh-wave ellipticity for site-specific hazard assessment and microzonation: application to the city of Lucerne, Switzerland
    Poggi, Valerio
    Faeh, Donat
    Burjanek, Jan
    Giardini, Domenico
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 188 (03) : 1154 - 1172