Cross-Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Professionalism Behaviors

被引:41
|
作者
Kelley, Katherine A. [1 ]
Stanke, Luke D. [2 ]
Rabi, Suzanne M. [3 ]
Kuba, Sarah E. [4 ]
Janke, Kristin K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Pharm, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Pharm, Madison, WI USA
关键词
professionalism; assessment; self-assessment; survey; factor analysis; cross-validation; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; SCALE;
D O I
10.5688/ajpe759179
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. To cross-validate an instrument to measure behavioral aspects of professionalism in pharmacy students using a rating scale that minimizes ceiling effects. Methods. Seven institutions collaborated to create a 33-item assessment tool that included 5 domains of professionalism: (1) Reliability, Responsibility and Accountability; (2) Lifelong Learning and Adaptability; (3) Relationships with Others; (4) Upholding Principles of Integrity and Respect; and (5) Citizenship and Professional Engagement. Each item was rated based on 5 levels of competency which were aligned with a modified Miller's Taxonomy (Knows, Knows How, Shows, Shows How and Does, and Teaches). Results. Factor analyses confirmed the presence of 5 domains for professionalism. The factor analyses from the 7-school pilot study demonstrated that professionalism items were good fits within each of the 5 domains. Conclusions. Based on a multi-institutional pilot study, data from the Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT), provide evidence for internal validity and reliability. Use of the tool by external evaluators should be explored in future research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-validation of an instrument measuring students attitudes toward pharmaceutical care
    Martin, BC
    Chisholm, MA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 1999, 63 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [2] POTENTIAL OF COGNITIVE PLASTICITY AS A DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT - A CROSS-VALIDATION AND EXTENSION
    BALTES, MM
    KUHL, KP
    GUTZMANN, H
    SOWARKA, D
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1995, 10 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [3] A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
    Faries, Douglas E.
    Houston, John P.
    Sulcs, Ellen M.
    Swindle, Ralph W.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2012, 13
  • [4] A cross-validation of the provisional diagnostic instrument (PDI-4)
    Douglas E Faries
    John P Houston
    Ellen M Sulcs
    Ralph W Swindle
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 13
  • [5] CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING INGRATIATORY BEHAVIORS IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS
    KUMAR, K
    BEYERLEIN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (05) : 619 - 627
  • [6] Fast Cross-Validation
    Liu, Yong
    Lin, Hailun
    Ding, Lizhong
    Wang, Weiping
    Liao, Shizhong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 2497 - 2503
  • [7] Cross-Validation With Confidence
    Lei, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (532) : 1978 - 1997
  • [8] SMOOTHED CROSS-VALIDATION
    HALL, P
    MARRON, JS
    PARK, BU
    [J]. PROBABILITY THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 1992, 92 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [9] PARAMETERS OF CROSS-VALIDATION
    HERZBERG, PA
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1969, 34 (2P2) : 1 - &
  • [10] Cross-validation methods
    Browne, MW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 44 (01) : 108 - 132