ADAPTIVE SELECTION OF SAMPLING POINTS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION

被引:2
|
作者
Camporeale, Enrico [1 ]
Agnihotri, Ashutosh [1 ]
Rutjes, Casper [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Math & Comp Sci CWI, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
adaptive sampling; hierarchical surplus; Clenshaw-Curtis; OPTIMAL SHAPE-PARAMETERS; DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS; STOCHASTIC COLLOCATION; NUMERICAL-METHODS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2017020027
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We present a simple and robust strategy for the selection of sampling points in uncertainty quantification. The goal is to achieve the fastest possible convergence in the cumulative distribution function of a stochastic output of interest. We assume that the output of interest is the outcome of a computationally expensive nonlinear mapping of an input random variable, whose probability density function is known. We use a radial function basis to construct an accurate interpolant of the mapping. This strategy enables adding new sampling points one at a time, adaptively. This takes into full account the previous evaluations of the target nonlinear function. We present comparisons with a stochastic collocation method based on the Clenshaw-Curtis quadrature rule, and with an adaptive method based on hierarchical surplus, showing that the new method often results in a large computational saving.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 301
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Kriging-Based Dynamic Adaptive Sampling Method for Uncertainty Quantification
    Shimoyama, Koji
    Kawai, Soshi
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2019, 62 (03) : 137 - 150
  • [2] Selection of sampling points
    [J]. AIChE Equipment Testing Procedure, 1990,
  • [3] Sampling image segmentations for uncertainty quantification
    Le, Matthieu
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Ayache, Nicholas
    Delingette, Herve
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2016, 34 : 42 - 51
  • [4] Nested sampling algorithm for subsurface flow model selection, uncertainty quantification, and nonlinear calibration
    Elsheikh, A. H.
    Wheeler, M. F.
    Hoteit, I.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (12) : 8383 - 8399
  • [5] Multi-Fidelity Adaptive Sampling for Surrogate-Based Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification
    Garbo, Andrea
    Parekh, Jigar
    Rischmann, Tilo
    Bekemeyer, Philipp
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2024, 11 (06)
  • [6] High-Dimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Tensor Regression With Rank Determination and Adaptive Sampling
    He, Zichang
    Zhang, Zheng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS PACKAGING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (09): : 1317 - 1328
  • [7] The dangers of sparse sampling for the quantification of margin and uncertainty
    Hemez, Francois M.
    Atamturktur, Sezer
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) : 1220 - 1231
  • [8] Comparison of Stochastic Sampling Algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification
    Mohamed, Linah
    Christie, Mike
    Demyanov, Vasily
    [J]. SPE JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (01): : 31 - 38
  • [9] Adaptive decomposition technique for uncertainty quantification
    Le Maitre, O. P.
    Najm, H. N.
    Knio, C. M.
    Ghanem, R. G.
    [J]. Structural Dynamics - EURODYN 2005, Vols 1-3, 2005, : 817 - 822
  • [10] Adaptive sampling for optimization under uncertainty
    Wan, Z
    Igusa, T
    [J]. ISUMA 2003: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND ANALYSIS, 2003, : 423 - 428