Urban Heritage Facility Management: A Scoping Review

被引:11
|
作者
Prabowo, Bintang Noor [1 ]
Salaj, Alenka Temeljotov [1 ]
Lohne, Jardar [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 20期
关键词
facility management (FM); urban FM; urban heritage; conservation; the HUL approach; ADAPTIVE REUSE; BIM; LANDSCAPE; BUILDINGS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; MAINTENANCE; CITIES; VALUES; SPACES;
D O I
10.3390/app11209443
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This review examines current discussions from the cross-section study between urban heritage conservation and urban facility management fields in the academic literature from 2011-2020. The purpose is to identify the gaps within the examined papers to reveal the challenges and opportunities in the combined fields using the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)'s recommendation of the historic urban landscape (HUL) approach. The scoping review procedure was followed. The six critical steps and four supporting tools of the HUL approach were used to analyze the examined papers. Most aspects of urban heritage management within the body of literature were directly related to urban-scale facility management. The potential usage of building information modelling became one of the most discussed technological aspects. The expansion of the public-private partnership model into the public-private-people partnership is considered as a new potential business model. At the same time, the adaptive reuse approach is deemed to be the most sustainable method of managing heritage areas. This scoping review identified the financial tools as the most under-researched urban heritage facility management component. Therefore, it needs to be endorsed among the scientific communities to improve the knowledge and provide operable guidelines for the authorities and practitioners in the urban heritage field.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regenerative urban heritage model: Scoping review of paradigms’ progression
    Farouk Hassan, Ghada
    Rashed, Rowaida
    Mohsen EL Nagar, Samar
    [J]. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [2] Identifying Urban Heritage Facility Management Support Services Considering World Heritage Sites
    Prabowo, Bintang Noor
    Salaj, Alenka Temeljotov
    Lohne, Jardar
    [J]. URBAN SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [3] Urban Heritage Facility Management: A Conceptual Framework for the Provision of Urban-Scale Support Services in Norwegian World Heritage Sites
    Prabowo, Bintang Noor
    Temeljotov Salaj, Alenka
    Lohne, Jardar
    [J]. HERITAGE, 2024, 7 (03): : 1372 - 1399
  • [4] The older adults in the smart urban heritage area: A mini-scoping review of inclusivity in the World Heritage sites
    Prabowo, Bintang Noor
    Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 9570 - 9575
  • [5] Urban facility management
    Salaj, Alenka Temeljotov
    Lindkvist, Carmel Margaret
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2021, 39 (7/8) : 525 - 537
  • [6] Ecosystem Functions in Urban Stormwater Management Ponds: A Scoping Review
    Marques, Piata
    Mandrak, Nicholas E.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [7] Arabic as a heritage language: A scoping review
    Visona, Mark Winston
    Plonsky, Luke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2020, 24 (04) : 599 - 615
  • [8] Introducing Urban Cultural Heritage Management into Urban Planning Management
    XIAO Jianli
    Post PhD
    [J]. China City Planning Review, 2008, 17 (02) : 47 - 55
  • [9] Natural dynamics and watershed approach incorporation in urban water management: A scoping review
    Canteiro, Marcelo
    Cotler, Helena
    Mazari-Hiriart, Marisa
    Babinet, Nadjeli
    Maass, Manuel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [10] Case Management Redesign in an Urban Facility
    Almaden, Stefany
    Freshman, Brenda
    Quaye, Beverly
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 16 (04) : 199 - 209