Investor sentiment and stock return volatility: evidence from the Indian Stock Exchange

被引:2
|
作者
Sreenu, N. [1 ]
Naik, Suresh [2 ]
机构
[1] MANIT, Management, Bhopal, India
[2] Inst Insurance & Risk Management, Dept Econ, Hyderabad, India
关键词
Volatility; Behavioural finance; Stock market; CAPM; GARCH-M; E-GARCH-M; C2; G12; G41; PROSPECT-THEORY;
D O I
10.1108/APJBA-11-2020-0405
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose In any stock market, volatility is a significant factor in strengthening their asset pricing. The upsurge in volatility in the stock market can activate and bring changes in the financial risk. According to financial conventional theory, the stakeholders (investors) are selected to be balanced and variations in pertinent risk are also to be anticipated due to the outcome of the drive-in basic factors in Indian stock markets. The hypothesis shows that there are actions in systematic and unsystematic risks that are determined by volatility. It is allied to sentiment-driven in the trader movement. Design/methodology/approach The paper used the methodology of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity-in mean GARCH-M and exponential GARCH-M (E-GARCH-M) methods on the Indian stock market. The data have been covered from 2000 to 2019. Findings Finally, the study suggests that due to the unfitness of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the selection has enhanced with sentiment is an important risk factor. Practical implications The investor sentiment and stock return volatility statement are established by using the investor sentiment amalgamated stock market index built. Originality/value The outcome of the study shows that there is an important association between stakeholder (investor) sentiment and stock return, in case of volatility behavioural finance can significantly explain the behaviour of stock returns on the Indian Stock Exchange.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 478
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investor sentiment and stock return volatility: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
    Rupande, Lorraine
    Muguto, Hilary Tinotenda
    Muzindutsi, Paul-Francois
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [2] Asymmetric relationship of investor sentiment with stock return and volatility: evidence from India
    Chakraborty, Madhumita
    Subramaniam, Sowmya
    [J]. REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2020, 12 (04) : 435 - 454
  • [3] Investor sentiment and stock volatility: New evidence
    Gong, Xue
    Zhang, Weiguo
    Wang, Junbo
    Wang, Chao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 80
  • [4] The impact of investor sentiment on sectoral returns and volatility: Evidence from the Johannesburg stock exchange
    Muguto, Hilary Tinotenda
    Muguto, Lorraine
    Bhayat, Azra
    Ncalane, Hawaa
    Jack, Kara Jasmine
    Abdullah, Saadia
    Nkosi, Thabile Siphesihle
    Muzindutsi, Paul-Francois
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [5] The relationship between individual investor sentiment, stock return and volatility Evidence from the Turkish market
    Sayim, Mustafa
    Rahman, Hamid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2015, 10 (03) : 504 - +
  • [6] The Nonlinear Relationship between Investor Sentiment, Stock Return, and Volatility
    He, Gang
    Zhu, Shuzhen
    Gu, Haifeng
    [J]. DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2020, 2020
  • [7] Returns, volatility and investor sentiment: Evidence from European stock markets
    Frugier, Alain
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2016, 38 : 45 - 55
  • [8] Market Sentiment and Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange
    Tohidi, Mohammad
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2022, 15 (04) : 701 - 720
  • [9] Microblogging Sentiment Investor, Return and Volatility in the COVID-19 Era: Indonesian Stock Exchange
    Fariska, Putri
    Nugraha, Nugraha
    Putera, Ika
    Rohandi, Mochamad Malik Akbar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (03): : 61 - 67
  • [10] Investor types and stock return volatility
    Che, Limei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2018, 47 : 139 - 161