A qualitative study of the implementation of a bioinformatics tool in a biological research laboratory

被引:165
|
作者
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Ash, Joan S.
Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biomed & Hlth Informat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med Informat & Clin Epidemiol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
evaluation studies; bioinformatics; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.022
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore how the implementation of a comprehensive new bioinformatics analysis system would affect workflow, collaboration and information management in a small genetic research lab. Design: This was a longitudinal qualitative study of seven individuals involved in genomic and proteomic research. The study data were gathered using the illuminative/responsive approach of immersion in the environment. Additional qualitative data were gathered using informal semi-structured interviews, participant observation in lab meetings, and direct observation of lab researchers engaged in specific tasks. Measurements: Interview, observation and field note data were coded and analyzed based on three analysis perspectives. A subset of the data was independently evaluated by an external researcher to enhance the trustworthiness of results. Results: Three reoccurring themes were observed in the study. (1) Satisfaction and acceptance of software tools tended to be role and goal specific. (2) The system was seen primarily as a measurement system rather than a "total laboratory analysis system". (3) Lab meetings deemphasized the system, preferring more traditional data analysis techniques. These themes support the observations that the system was not used to its full potential in the lab. Conclusion: Themes identified in this study suggest that sophisticated genetic researchers face similar problems of technology implementation as do professionals in other fields. We recommend that leadership support and on-going training and evolution of academic curricula can improve chances of bioinformatics analysis systems becoming used more effectively. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 828
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A model for Bioinformatics training: the marine biological laboratory
    Yamashita, Grant
    Miller, Holly
    Goddard, Anthony
    Norton, Cathy
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 11 (06) : 610 - 615
  • [2] The qualitative research laboratory
    Morse, J
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (03) : 299 - 300
  • [3] BART: bioinformatics array research tool
    Amaral, Maria Luisa
    Erikson, Galina A.
    Shokhirev, Maxim N.
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 19
  • [4] BART: bioinformatics array research tool
    Maria Luisa Amaral
    Galina A. Erikson
    Maxim N. Shokhirev
    [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 19
  • [5] Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers affecting implementation of an online frailty tool into primary health care: a qualitative study
    Grace Warner
    Beverley Lawson
    Tara Sampalli
    Fred Burge
    Rick Gibson
    Stephanie Wood
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [6] Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers affecting implementation of an online frailty tool into primary health care: a qualitative study
    Warner, Grace
    Lawson, Beverley
    Sampalli, Tara
    Burge, Fred
    Gibson, Rick
    Wood, Stephanie
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [7] Implementation of a need assessment tool in cancer rehabilitation. A qualitative study
    Thayssen, Susanne
    Hansen, Dorte Gilsa
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Christensen, Palle Mark
    Hoybye, Mette Terp
    Hansen, Helle Ploug
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2014, 13 : 555 - 556
  • [8] Omics-oriented research illustrated with the LEAP study and the OASIS bioinformatics tool
    Baloh, Carolyn H.
    Kanchan, Kanika
    Shankar, Gautam
    Nepom, Gerald T.
    Mathias, Rasika A.
    Perry, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 151 (02) : 416 - 419
  • [9] Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool: a reflective tool to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork using Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation
    Nancarrow, Susan A.
    Smith, Tony
    Ariss, Steven
    Enderby, Pamela M.
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2015, 23 (04) : 437 - 448
  • [10] Supporting preference talk in oncology with the Outcome Prioritization Tool: a qualitative implementation study of a conversation tool
    Richter, Romy
    Jansen, Jesse
    Vreugdenhil, Art
    Van Der Weijden, Trudy
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP133 - NP134