Early reading intervention can be effective and cost-effective

被引:21
|
作者
Nicolson, RI
Fawcett, AJ
Moss, H
Nicolson, MK
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Educ, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1348/000709999157563
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Aims. To develop and evaluate an intervention strategy for children at risk of reading failure in their first year at school. Samples. Classes in four UK infant schools with different demographic characteristics were screened to identify children most at risk of reading failure (62 in total, mean initial age 6.0 years). Control children, matched overall for age and reading performance, were selected from comparable schools. Methods,The selected children were given an individually adaptive, curriculum-based, support programme with the emphasis on word building and phonics skills in the broad reading context. The programme was administered to children in groups of four for two half-hour sessions per week for 10 weeks. Results. The intervention group improved significantly in mean reading standard score (from 89.0 to 92.8), whereas the control group made no overall improvement. The intervention proved cost-effective, with mean 'effect size' comparable to those reported for Reading Recovery, yet with only 10% of the costs. Despite the clear progress of the intervention group overall, 25% remained 'problem readers' (with reading still at least 6 months behind). Of these problem readers 88% had initial 'at risk' or 'borderline risk' scores on the DEST screening test, compared with only 28% of the 'recovered readers'. Conclusions. The following three-stage intervention strategy is promising: (i) children at risk of reading difficulties are identified before 6 years; (ii) at risk children are given a small-group intervention programme for 3-4 months; (iii) children still failing to make progress may then be given continuing targeted additional support.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 62
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] READING RECOVERY - IS IT EFFECTIVE - IS IT COST-EFFECTIVE
    BRACEY, GW
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1995, 76 (06) : 493 - 494
  • [2] IS INTERVENTION COST-EFFECTIVE
    RECKLESS, JPD
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 68 (805) : 882 - 883
  • [3] When can we be sure an intervention is cost-effective?
    Myers, E. R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (07) : 1221 - 1221
  • [4] Is early intervention effective and cost effective?
    McGorry, PD
    Edwards, J
    Mihalopoulos, C
    Jackson, H
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (1-2) : 208 - 208
  • [5] Can a costly intervention be cost-effective? An analysis of violence prevention
    Foster, E. Michael
    Jones, Damon
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 63 (11) : 1284 - 1291
  • [6] CAN CARDIOLOGISTS BE COST-EFFECTIVE
    GARSON, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 11 (10) : 895 - 900
  • [7] Can an Intervention Be Cost-effective Following a Negative Clinical Trial?
    Ney, John
    van der Goes, David Noel
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (24) : 1123 - 1124
  • [8] Cost-effective prediction of reading difficulties
    Heath, SM
    Hogben, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (04): : 751 - 765
  • [9] Is Early Intervention in Psychosis Cost-Effective Over the Long Term?
    Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
    Harris, Meredith
    Henry, Lisa
    Harrigan, Susy
    McGorry, Patrick
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (05) : 909 - 918
  • [10] Cancer information: a cost-effective intervention
    Mossman, J
    Boudioni, M
    Slevin, ML
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 (11) : 1587 - 1591