Matlab modeling of ITER CODAC

被引:2
|
作者
Pangione, L. [1 ]
Lister, J. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ric Frascati, ENEA Fus, EURATOM Assoc, I-00044 Rome, Italy
[2] Assoc EURATOM Suisse, EPFL, CRPP, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ITER; CODAC; Matlab/Simulink; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.12.022
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The ITER CODAC (COntrol, Data Access and Communication) conceptual design resulted from 2 years of activity. One result was a proposed functional partitioning of CODAC into different CODAC Systems, each of them partitioned into other CODAC Systems. Considering the large size of this project, simple use of human language assisted by figures would certainly be ineffective in creating an unambiguous description of all interactions and all relations between these Systems. Moreover, the underlying design is resident in the mind of the designers, who must consider all possible situations that could happen to each system. There is therefore a need to model the whole of CODAC with a clear and preferably graphical method, which allows the designers to verify the correctness and the consistency of their project. The aim of this paper is to describe the work started on ITER CODAC modeling using Matlab/Simulink. The main feature of this tool is the possibility of having a simple, graphical, intuitive representation of a complex system and ultimately to run a numerical simulation of it. Using Matlab/Simulink, each CODAC System was represented in a graphical and intuitive form with its relations and interactions through the definition of a small number of simple rules. In a Simulink diagram, each system was represented as a "black box", both containing, and connected to, a number of other systems. In this way it is possible to move vertically between systems on different levels, to show the relation of membership, or horizontally to analyse the information exchange between systems at the same level. This process can be iterated, starting from a global diagram, in which only CODAC appears with the Plant Systems and the external sites, and going deeper down to the mathematical model of each CODAC system. The Matlab/Simulink features for simulating the whole top diagram encourage us to develop the idea of completing the functionalities of all systems in order to finally have a full simulation of ITER CODAC. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 551
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RAMI analysis of ITER CODAC
    Kitazawa, Sin-iti
    Okayama, Katsumi
    Neyatani, Yuzuru
    Sagot, Francois
    van Houtte, Didier
    Abadie, Lana
    Yonekawa, Izuru
    Wallander, Anders
    Klotz, Wolf-Dieter
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2012, 87 (7-8) : 1510 - 1513
  • [2] The ITER CODAC network design
    Liu, Guoming
    Makijarvi, Petri
    Pons, Nicolas
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 130 : 6 - 10
  • [3] The ITER CODAC conceptual design
    Lister, J. B.
    Farthing, J. W.
    Greenwald, M.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2007, 82 (5-14) : 1167 - 1173
  • [4] Overview of the ITER CODAC conceptual design
    Lister, J. B.
    Farthing, J. W.
    Greenwald, M.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. 2007 15TH IEEE-NPSS REAL-TIME CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 192 - +
  • [5] ITER CODAC Status and Implementation Plan
    Utzel, Nadine
    Klotz, W. D.
    Wallander, A.
    Dave, H.
    Di Maio, F.
    Gulati, H. K.
    Hansalia, C.
    Joonekindt, D.
    Journeaux, J. Y.
    Mahajan, K.
    Makijarvi, P.
    Scibile, L.
    Stepanov, D.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2010, 57 (02) : 700 - 707
  • [6] The status of the ITER CODAC conceptual design
    Lister, J. B.
    Farthing, J. W.
    Greenwald, M.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 83 (2-3) : 164 - 169
  • [7] ITER CODAC status and implementation plan
    Utzel, N.
    Klotz, W.D.
    Wallander, A.
    Dave, H.
    Di Maio, F.
    Gulati, H.K.
    Hansalia, C.
    Joonekindt, D.
    Journeaux, J.Y.
    Mahajan, K.
    Makijarvi, P.
    Scibile, L.
    Stepanov, D.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. 2009 16th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference - Conference Record, 2009, : 1 - 6
  • [8] Software Quality Assurance activities of ITER CODAC
    Pande, Sopan
    DiMaio, Franck
    Kim, Changseung
    Kim, Joohan
    Klotz, Wolf-Dieter
    Makijarvi, Petri
    Stepanov, Denis
    Wallander, Anders
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 88 (6-8) : 1437 - 1440
  • [9] Integration of the ITER diagnostic plant systems with CODAC
    Simrock, S.
    Barnsley, R.
    Bertalot, L.
    Hansalia, C.
    Klotz, W. D.
    Makijarvi, P.
    Reichle, R.
    Vayakis, G.
    Yonekawa, I.
    Walker, C.
    Wallander, A.
    Walsh, M.
    Winter, A.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 86 (6-8) : 1145 - 1148
  • [10] ITER CODAC Status and Implementation Plan.
    Utzel, N.
    Klotz, W. D.
    Wallander, A.
    Dave, H.
    Di Maio, F.
    Gulati, H. K.
    Hansalia, C.
    Joonekindt, D.
    Journecaux, J. Y.
    Mahajan, K.
    Makijarvi, P.
    Scibile, L.
    Stepanov, D.
    Yonekawa, I.
    [J]. 2009 16TH IEEE-NPSS REAL TIME CONFERENCE, 2009, : 1 - +