Online discussion and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum: Flaming keyboards or forums for deliberation?

被引:20
|
作者
Quinlan, Stephen [1 ]
Shephard, Mark [2 ]
Paterson, Lindsay [3 ]
机构
[1] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Referendums; Deliberation; Discussion forums; Scottish independence; Online content analysis; DEMOCRACY; ELECTION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.009
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Referendums often fail to live up to a deliberative standard, with many characterised by low levels of knowledge, disinterest and misinformation, negativity, and a focus on extraneous issues to which voters are voting. But social media offers new avenues for referendums to incorporate a greater deliberative dimension. Through a content analysis of BBC discussion forums, we test whether online discussion of the Scottish independence referendum has deliberative characteristics. Results suggest a mixed picture with conversation displaying some deliberative features (low incidences of flaming/discussion of referendum issues). However, low levels of discussion intensity, dominance by a few, little knowledge exchange, and high gender inequality illustrate that online referendum discussion lacks deliberative characteristics, implying that social media are not a panacea for referendum deliberation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 205
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条