Predicting student performance in a blended MOOC

被引:61
|
作者
Conijn, R. [1 ,2 ]
Van den Beemt, A. [2 ]
Cuijpers, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Cognit Sci & Artificial Intelligence, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven Sch Educ, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
blended learning; learning analytics; MOOC; MOOC improvement; predictive modeling; process mining; LEARNING ANALYTICS; ONLINE; SUCCESS; MOTIVATIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12270
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Predicting student performance is a major tool in learning analytics. This study aims to identify how different measures of massive open online course (MOOC) data can be used to identify points of improvement in MOOCs. In the context of MOOCs, student performance is often defined as course completion. However, students could have other learning objectives than MOOC completion. Therefore, we define student performance as obtaining personal learning objective(s). This study examines a subsample of students in a graduate-level blended MOOC who shared on-campus course completion as a learning objective. Aggregated activity frequencies, specific course item frequencies, and order of activities were analysed to predict student performance using correlations, multiple regressions, and process mining. All aggregated MOOC activity frequencies related positively to on-campus exam grade. However, this relation is less clear when controlling for past performance. In total, 65% of the specific course items showed significant correlations with final exam grade. Students who passed the course spread their learning over more days compared with students who failed. Little difference was found in the order of activities within the MOOC between students who passed and who failed. The results are combined with course evaluations to identify points of improvement within the MOOC.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 628
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to measure student engagement in the context of blended-MOOC
    Almutairi, Fadiyah
    White, Su
    [J]. INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2018, 15 (03) : 262 - 278
  • [2] Predicting Student Success in a Blended Learning Environment
    Van Goidsenhoven, Steven
    Bogdanova, Daria
    Deeva, Galina
    vanden Broucke, Seppe
    De Weerdt, Jochen
    Snoeck, Monique
    [J]. LAK20: THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, : 17 - 25
  • [3] PREDICTING STUDENT PERFORMANCE
    NISBET, J
    WELSH, J
    [J]. UNIVERSITIES QUARTERLY, 1966, 20 (04): : 468 - 480
  • [4] Blended Learning and Student Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Student Performance
    Zeqiri, Jusuf
    Kareva, Veronika
    Alija, Sadri
    [J]. BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (02): : 79 - 94
  • [5] Student Performance Prediction Based on Blended Learning
    Xu, Zhuojia
    Yuan, Hua
    Liu, Qishan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2021, 64 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [6] Blended and online learning: student perceptions and performance
    Adam, Stewart
    Nel, Deon
    [J]. INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2009, 6 (03) : 140 - +
  • [7] Assessing the Impact of Blended Learning on Student Performance
    Kwak, Do Won
    Menezes, Flavio M.
    Sherwood, Carl
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2015, 91 (292) : 91 - 106
  • [8] Bricks or clicks? Predicting student intentions in a blended learning buffet
    Hood, Michelle
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 29 (06) : 762 - 776
  • [9] Improving Prediction of Student Performance in a Blended Course
    Sosnovsky, Sergey
    Hamzah, Almed
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, PT I, 2022, 13355 : 594 - 599
  • [10] Predicting Student Academic Performance
    Li, Kin Fun
    Rusk, David
    Song, Fred
    [J]. 2013 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT, AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS (CISIS), 2013, : 27 - 33