Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data

被引:78
|
作者
Frost, Nollaig [1 ]
Nolas, Sevasti Melissa [1 ]
Brooks-Gordon, Belinda [2 ]
Esin, Cigdem [3 ]
Holt, Amanda [4 ]
Mehdizadeh, Leila [5 ]
Shinebourne, Pnina [2 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Dept Psychol, Sch Hlth & Social Serv, London NW4 4BT, England
[2] Univ London, London WC1E 7HU, England
[3] Univ E London, London E15 4LZ, England
[4] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, Hants, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
mixed methods; pluralism; qualitative research; rigour; subjectivity; transparency;
D O I
10.1177/1468794110366802
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Qualitative approaches to research in psychology and the social sciences are increasingly used. The variety of approaches incorporates different epistemologies, theoretical traditions and practices with associated analysis techniques spanning a range of theoretical and empirical frameworks. Despite the increase in mixed method approaches it is unusual for qualitative methods to be used in combination with each other. The Pluralism in Qualitative Research project (PQR) was developed in order to investigate the benefits and creative tensions of integrating diverse qualitative approaches. Among other objectives it seeks to interrogate the contributions and impact of researchers and methods on data analysis. The article presents our pluralistic analysis of a single semi-structured interview transcript. Analyses were carried out by different researchers using grounded theory, Foucauldian discourse analysis, interpretative phenomenological analysis and narrative analysis. We discuss the variation and agreement in the analysis of the data. The implications of the findings on the conduct, writing and presentation of qualitative research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 460
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Demystifying Qualitative Data Analysis for Novice Qualitative Researchers
    Kalpokaite, Neringa
    Radivojevic, Ivana
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2019, 24 (13): : 44 - 57
  • [2] Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis
    Emerson, Robert Wall
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2022, 116 (02) : 300 - 301
  • [3] Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis
    Azungah, Theophilus
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04) : 383 - 400
  • [4] Qualitative Research for Social Workers or Social Work for Qualitative Researchers?
    Wulff, Dan
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2009, 14 (01) : 56 - 59
  • [5] Big Data? Qualitative Approaches to Digital Research
    Whiting, Rebecca
    Pritchard, Katrina
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 10 (03): : 296 - +
  • [6] Experienced qualitative researchers' views on teaching students qualitative research design
    Castell, Emily
    Muir, Shannon
    Roberts, Lynne D.
    Allen, Peter
    Rezae, Mortaza
    Krishna, Aneesh
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 19 (04) : 978 - 1003
  • [7] Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research
    Sandelowski, M
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) : 230 - 240
  • [8] Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Data Analysis
    Im, Dasom
    Pyo, Jeehee
    Lee, Haneul
    Jung, Hyeran
    Ock, Minsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 56 (02): : 100 - 110
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE DATA IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
    Ortega Chavez, Wilmer
    Aponte Rojas, Oseas
    Canteno Gavino, Rolando Carlos
    Chijchiapaza Chamorro, Selene Luz
    Padilla Huarac, Carmen Flor
    [J]. REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2022, 14 (02): : 617 - 627
  • [10] INTERSECTIONALITY AND QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH: POTENTIALS TO IMPACT QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
    Roes, Martina
    Laporte-Uribe, Franziska
    Bhatt, Jem
    Smits, Carolien
    Johanessen, Aud
    Peters-Nehrenheim, Viktoria
    Tezcan-Guentekin, Huerrem
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 245 - 246