How to Improve Deep Learning for Software Analytics (a case study with code smell detection)

To reduce technical debt and make code more maintainable, it is important to be able to warn programmers about code smells. State-of-the-art code small detectors use deep learners, usually without exploring alternatives. For example, one promising alternative is GHOST (from TSE'21) that relies on a combination of hyper-parameter optimization of feedforward neural networks and a novel oversampling technique. The prior study from TSE'21 proposing this novel "fuzzy sampling" was somewhat limited in that the method was tested on defect prediction, but nothing else. Like defect prediction, code smell detection datasets have a class imbalance (which motivated "fuzzy sampling"). Hence, in this work we test if fuzzy sampling is useful for code smell detection. The results of this paper show that we can achieve better than state-of-the-art results on code smell detection with fuzzy oversampling. For example, for "feature envy", we were able to achieve 99+% AUC across all our datasets, and on 8/10 datasets for "misplaced class". While our specific results refer to code smell detection, they do suggest other lessons for other kinds of analytics. For example: (a) try better preprocessing before trying complex learners (b) include simpler learners as a baseline in software analytics (c) try "fuzzy sampling" as one such baseline. In order to support others trying to reproduce/extend/refute this work, all our code and data is available online at https://github.com/yrahul3910/code-smell-detection.