Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides: testing alternate gravitational theories

被引:0
|
作者
Standish, E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
关键词
ephemerides; Pioneer Anomaly; accuracy; gravity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The planetary and lunar ephemerides have been improved over the past century by many orders of magnitude. It is expected that they will improve again into the fairly near future. The improvements come from more accurate observational data, from increased modelling of the gravitational equations of motion, and from the ability to numerically integrate the equations of motion. Present-day ephemerides have the accuracy to be able to test a number of proposed possible modifications to the presently accepted laws of gravitation. In the future, with further improved accuracies, the ephemerides will be able to test even more subtle modifications. Experiments show that the Voyager range residuals at Uranus and Neptune, reported by Anderson et al. (1995) [1], are fully consistent with other observational data and with present-day ephemerides. The modification to the laws of gravitation which is usually quoted to explain the Pioneer Anomaly, that of a constant acceleration of 8.74 x 10(-10) m/sec(2) directed toward the sun, added to each planet's acceleration, has been shown to be completely inconsistent with the planetary ephemerides. A suggested alternative form, where the acceleration is proportional to the planet's radial velocity, is marginally acceptable, but only when applied to just the planets past Saturn. A further form, where the acceleration is proportional to the planet's radial velocity squared, is acceptable to the planets from Saturn and outward. In none of the cases that were tested, can the force modification be applied to Jupiter: the changes in the solution parameters used to adjust the ephemerides become totally unacceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 263
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides
    Fienga, Agnes
    Minazzoli, Olivier
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [2] Testing alternate gravitational theories
    Standish, E. M.
    RELATIVITY IN FUNDAMENTAL ASTRONOMY: DYNAMICS, REFERENCE FRAMES, AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2010, (261): : 179 - 182
  • [3] COMPRESSED PLANETARY AND LUNAR EPHEMERIDES
    Kammeyer, Peter
    CELESTIAL MECHANICS & DYNAMICAL ASTRONOMY, 1988, 45 (1-3): : 311 - 316
  • [4] Planetary and lunar ephemerides, lunar laser ranging, and lunar physical librations
    Newhall, XX
    Williams, JG
    Standish, EM
    DYNAMICS, EPHEMERIDES AND ASTROMETRY OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM, 1996, (172): : 37 - 44
  • [5] TESTING GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES WITH PLANETARY RADAR OBSERVATIONS
    SHAPIRO, II
    ASH, ME
    SMITH, WB
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1966, 71 (09): : 870 - &
  • [6] PLANETARY EPHEMERIDES
    MELBOURN.WG
    ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS, 1970, 8 (05): : 38 - &
  • [7] The JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE440 and DE441
    Park, Ryan S.
    Folkner, William M.
    Williams, James G.
    Boggs, Dale H.
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 161 (03):
  • [8] Laser ranging for gravitational, lunar and planetary science
    Merkowitz, Stephen M.
    Dabney, Philip W.
    Livas, Jeffrey C.
    Mcgarry, Jan F.
    Neumann, Gregory A.
    Zagwodzki, Thomas W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2007, 16 (12A): : 2151 - 2164
  • [9] TESTING GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES
    BERTOTTI, B
    NATURE, 1980, 284 (5752) : 125 - 125
  • [10] THE JPL PLANETARY EPHEMERIDES
    STANDISH, EM
    CELESTIAL MECHANICS, 1982, 26 (02): : 181 - 186