Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep

被引:32
|
作者
Bolormaa, Sunduimijid [1 ,7 ]
Swan, Andrew A. [2 ,7 ]
Brown, Daniel J. [2 ,7 ]
Hatcher, Sue [3 ,7 ]
Moghaddar, Nasir [4 ,7 ]
van der Werf, Julius H. [4 ,7 ]
Goddard, Michael E. [1 ,5 ]
Daetwyler, Hans D. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] AgriBio Ctr, Agr Victoria Res, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[2] Univ New England, Anim Genet & Breeding Unit, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[3] Orange Agr Inst, NSW Dept Primary Ind, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
[4] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Sch Land & Environm, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, Sch Appl Syst Biol, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[7] Cooperat Res Ctr Sheep Ind Innovat, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
关键词
HAIR FOLLICLE STEM; BREEDING VALUES; MERINO SHEEP; GENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS; REPRODUCTION TRAITS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; QUALITY TRAITS; MEAT QUALITY; SNP CHIP; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-017-0337-y
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: The application of genomic selection to sheep breeding could lead to substantial increases in profitability of wool production due to the availability of accurate breeding values from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Several key traits determine the value of wool and influence a sheep's susceptibility to fleece rot and fly strike. Our aim was to predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) and to compare three methods of combining information across traits to map polymorphisms that affect these traits. Methods: GEBV for 5726 Merino and Merino crossbred sheep were calculated using BayesR and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with real and imputed 510,174 SNPs for 22 traits (at yearling and adult ages) including wool production and quality, and breech conformation traits that are associated with susceptibility to fly strike. Accuracies of these GEBV were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. We also devised and compared three approximate multi-trait analyses to map pleiotropic quantitative trait loci (QTL): a multi-trait genome-wide association study and two multi-trait methods that use the output from BayesR analyses. One BayesR method used local GEBV for each trait, while the other used the posterior probabilities that a SNP had an effect on each trait. Results: BayesR and GBLUP resulted in similar average GEBV accuracies across traits (similar to 0.22). BayesR accuracies were highest for wool yield and fibre diameter (>0.40) and lowest for skin quality and dag score (<0.10). Generally, accuracy was higher for traits with larger reference populations and higher heritability. In total, the three multi-trait analyses identified 206 putative QTL, of which 20 were common to the three analyses. The two BayesR multi-trait approaches mapped QTL in a more defined manner than the multi-trait GWAS. We identified genes with known effects on hair growth (i.e. FGF5, STAT3, KRT86, and ALX4) near SNPs with pleiotropic effects on wool traits. Conclusions: The mean accuracy of genomic prediction across wool traits was around 0.22. The three multi-trait analyses identified 206 putative QTL across the ovine genome. Detailed phenotypic information helped to identify likely candidate genes.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep
    Sunduimijid Bolormaa
    Andrew A. Swan
    Daniel J. Brown
    Sue Hatcher
    Nasir Moghaddar
    Julius H. van der Werf
    Michael E. Goddard
    Hans D. Daetwyler
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49
  • [2] Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models
    Gang Guo
    Fuping Zhao
    Yachun Wang
    Yuan Zhang
    Lixin Du
    Guosheng Su
    [J]. BMC Genetics, 15
  • [3] Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models
    Guo, Gang
    Zhao, Fuping
    Wang, Yachun
    Zhang, Yuan
    Du, Lixin
    Su, Guosheng
    [J]. BMC GENETICS, 2014, 15
  • [4] Bayesian mixture structural equation modelling in multiple-trait QTL mapping
    Mi, Xiaojuan
    Eskridge, Kent
    Wang, Dong
    Baenziger, P. Stephen
    Campbell, B. Todd
    Gill, Kulvinder S.
    Dweikat, Ismail
    [J]. GENETICS RESEARCH, 2010, 92 (03) : 239 - 250
  • [5] Multiple-trait genomic prediction for swine meat quality traits using gut microbiome features as a correlated trait
    Tiezzi, Francesco
    Schwab, Clint
    Shull, Caleb
    Maltecca, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2024,
  • [6] Novel Resampling Improves Statistical Power for Multiple-Trait QTL Mapping
    Cheng, Riyan
    Doerge, R. W.
    Borevitz, Justin
    [J]. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2017, 7 (03): : 813 - 822
  • [7] Multiple-trait genomic prediction of harvest and fillet traits in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer, Bloch 1790)
    Sukhavachana, Sila
    Senanan, Wansuk
    Pattarapanyawong, Naruechon
    Srithong, Chumpol
    Joerakate, Weerakit
    Tunkijjanukij, Suriyan
    Poompuang, Supawadee
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2021, 544
  • [8] Prediction of Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Genomic Data Using Recommender Systems
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    Montesinos-Lopez, Jose C.
    Mota-Sanchez, David
    Estrada-Gonzalez, Fermin
    Gillberg, Jussi
    Singh, Ravi
    Mondal, Suchismita
    Juliana, Philomin
    [J]. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2018, 8 (01): : 131 - 147
  • [9] An Effective Strategy for Trait Combinations in Multiple-Trait Genomic Selection
    Qiu, Zhixu
    Tang, Yunjia
    Ma, Chuang
    [J]. INTELLIGENT COMPUTING THEORIES AND APPLICATION, ICIC 2017, PT II, 2017, 10362 : 230 - 239
  • [10] A multi-trait Bayesian method for mapping QTL and genomic prediction
    Kemper, Kathryn E.
    Bowman, Philip J.
    Hayes, Benjamin J.
    Visscher, Peter M.
    Goddard, Michael E.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2018, 50