Evaluation of a Simplified Soil Constitutive Model Considering the Implied Strength and Porewater Pressure Generation for 1-D Seismic Site Response

被引:0
|
作者
Mei, Xuan [1 ]
Olson, Scott M. [1 ]
Hashash, Youssef M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Porewater pressure (PWP) generation leads to soil softening and potential liquefaction of sandy soils during earthquakes, and can decrease ground motion amplitudes at high frequencies and increase the predominant period of shaking. This paper presents an evaluation of the generalized Quadratic/Hyperbolic constitutive model (Groholski et al. 2016) coupled with two PWP generation models, termed GQ/H+u, as implemented in DEEPSOIL V 6.1 (Hashash et al. 2016). The GQ/H+u model can represent large-strain shear strength and thus provides more realistic response at liquefiable sites where large strains are expected. First, sets of cyclic direct simple shear tests were used to evaluate the models. Comparisons of measured and computed stress-strain loops and excess PWP generation illustrate that the model reasonably captures measured cyclic stress-strain and PWP responses. The GQ/H+u model also can reasonably capture acceleration time histories and response spectra measured in centrifuge tests in loose and dense sands subjected to strong shaking.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 360
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a simplified soil constitutive model considering implied strength and pore-water pressure generation for one-dimensional (1D) seismic site response
    Mei, Xuan
    Olson, Scott M.
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (07) : 974 - 991
  • [2] Empirical porewater pressure generation model parameters in 1-D seismic site response analysis
    Mei, Xuan
    Olson, Scott M.
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 114 : 563 - 567
  • [3] Constitutive model for 1-D cyclic soil behaviour applied to seismic analysis of layered deposits
    Gerolymos, N
    Gazetas, G
    [J]. SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2005, 45 (03) : 147 - 159
  • [4] Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis
    Groholski, David R.
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    Kim, Byungmin
    Musgrove, Michael
    Harmon, Joseph
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (09)
  • [5] Evaluation of 1-D seismic site response modeling of sand using centrifuge experiments
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    Dashti, Shideh
    Romero, Maria Ines
    Ghayoomi, Majid
    Musgrove, Michael
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 78 : 19 - 31
  • [6] A simple constitutive model for taking into account soil nonlinearity and strength in 1D site response analyses
    Conti, R.
    Licata, V
    Angelini, M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 1861 - 1869
  • [7] Time-domain dynamic constitutive model suitable for mucky soil site seismic response
    Dong, Qing
    Chen, Su
    Jin, Liguo
    Zhou, Zhenghua
    Li, Xiaojun
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2024, 23 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [8] Time-domain dynamic constitutive model suitable for mucky soil site seismic response
    Dong Qing
    Chen Su
    Jin Liguo
    Zhou Zhenghua
    Li Xiaojun
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024, 23 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [9] Time-domain dynamic constitutive model suitable for mucky soil site seismic response
    Qing Dong
    Su Chen
    Liguo Jin
    Zhenghua Zhou
    Xiaojun Li
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024, 23 : 1 - 13
  • [10] Comparison of 1-D Seismic Site Response Analysis Tools for Layered Liquefiable Deposits
    Yu, Hao
    Ntambakwa, Eric
    Mendes, Bruno
    Rogers, Matthew
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SPECIAL TOPICS (GEO-CONGRESS 2020), 2020, (318): : 215 - 224