Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the bone marrow after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

被引:22
|
作者
Hanaoka, Kohei [2 ]
Hosono, Makoto [1 ]
Usami, Kimio [1 ]
Tatsumi, Yoichi [3 ]
Yamazoe, Yuzuru [1 ]
Komeya, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Norio [1 ]
Ishii, Kazunari [2 ]
Sumita, Mitsugu [2 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Inst Adv Clin Med, Div Positron Emiss Tomog, Osaka 5898511, Japan
[2] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Kinki Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Osaka 5898511, Japan
[3] Kinki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol, Osaka 5898511, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
bone marrow; fluorodeoxyglucose; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; lymphoma; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; FDG-PET; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; PITFALLS; THERAPY; BENIGN; SCAN;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0b013e328346b32a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To clarify the change in the fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by the bone marrow over time after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), we evaluated the correlation between the interval from the last day of administration of G-CSF to positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) study and spinal bone marrow accumulation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Methods A total of 127 patients with confirmed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent FDG PET within 60 days from the last administration of G-CSF were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls were also included to evaluate physiological FDG uptake. PET/CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured by placing volumetric regions of interest over each thoracic and lumbar vertebra on PET images referring to CT images. Bone marrow SUV was defined as the mean SUVmax of the vertebra. The correlation between the interval after G-CSF and the bone marrow SUV was plotted and analyzed with polynomial approximation. Results In controls, physiological bone marrow SUV of the spine was determined. In patients with lymphoma, bone marrow SUV decreased over time and reached a plateau at about 14 days after G-CSF administration, and this was higher by 5% than the plateau at 10 days. SUV declined to the 'physiological range', that is, mean+ 1 standard deviation of patients, at about 7 days. Conclusion For a PET/CT study, an interval of 10 days after G-CSF administration is recommended to minimize the influence of G-CSF on the bone marrow when evaluating treatment response in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun 32:678-683 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 683
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interstitial pneumonitis related to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration following chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Hasegawa, Y
    Ninomiya, H
    Kamoshita, M
    Ohtani, K
    Kobayashi, T
    Kojima, H
    Nagasawa, T
    Abe, T
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 36 (05) : 360 - 364
  • [2] Pulmonary toxicity after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    N Yokose
    K Ogata
    H Tamura
    E An
    K Nakamura
    K Kamikubo
    S Kudoh
    K Dan
    T Nomura
    British Journal of Cancer, 1998, 77 : 2286 - 2290
  • [3] CHOP versus CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Alliot, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (21) : 4797 - 4799
  • [4] Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Neutropenic Events among Breast Cancer and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients
    Lin, Wan-Ting
    Wen, Tsun-Jen
    Chiang, Shao-Chin
    Shen, Li-Jiuan
    Hsiao, Fei-Yuan
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 243 - 244
  • [5] CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Doorduijn, JK
    van der Holt, B
    van Imhoff, GW
    van der Hem, KG
    Kramer, MHH
    van Oers, MHJ
    Ossenkoppele, GJ
    Schaafsma, MR
    Verdonck, LF
    Verhoef, GEG
    Steijaert, MMC
    Buijt, I
    Uyl-de Groot, CA
    van Agthoven, M
    Mulder, AH
    Sonneveld, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (16) : 3041 - 3050
  • [6] Risk factors for neutropenic fever in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis
    Kim, Yu Ri
    Kim, Soo-Jeong
    Park, Yong
    Oh, Sung Yong
    Yun, Hwan-Jung
    Mun, Yeung-Chul
    Kim, Jin Seok
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (05): : 1181 - 1189
  • [7] CHOP versus CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma - Reply
    Doorduijn, JK
    Sonneveld, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (21) : 4799 - 4800
  • [8] Economic evaluation of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Doorduijn, JK
    Buijt, I
    van der Holt, B
    van Agthoven, M
    Sonneveld, P
    Groot, CAU
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2004, 89 (09) : 1109 - 1117
  • [9] Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with a pirarubicin-combination chemotherapy regimen
    Guerci, A
    Lederlin, P
    Reyes, F
    Bordessoule, D
    Sebban, C
    Tilly, H
    Kerneis, Y
    Biron, P
    Gisselbrecht, C
    Herbrecht, R
    Coiffier, B
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1996, 7 (09) : 966 - 969
  • [10] Cost-minimization analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction chemotherapy in children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Rubino, C
    Laplanche, A
    Patte, C
    Michon, J
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (10): : 750 - 755