Systematic Evaluation of the Teaching Qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty: Reliability and Validity of the SETQ Tools

被引:36
|
作者
van der Leeuw, Renee [1 ]
Lombarts, Kiki [1 ]
Heineman, Maas Jan [2 ]
Arah, Onyebuchi [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Proc Innovat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN; IMPACT; GUIDE; VALIDATION; RESIDENTS; ROUNDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0019142
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The importance of effective clinical teaching for the quality of future patient care is globally understood. Due to recent changes in graduate medical education, new tools are needed to provide faculty with reliable and individualized feedback on their teaching qualities. This study validates two instruments underlying the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) aimed at measuring and improving the teaching qualities of obstetrics and gynecology faculty. Methods and Findings: This cross-sectional multi-center questionnaire study was set in seven general teaching hospitals and two academic medical centers in the Netherlands. Seventy-seven residents and 114 faculty were invited to complete the SETQ instruments in the duration of one month from September 2008 to September 2009. To assess reliability and validity of the instruments, we used exploratory factor analysis, inter-item correlation, reliability coefficient alpha and inter-scale correlations. We also compared composite scales from factor analysis to global ratings. Finally, the number of residents' evaluations needed per faculty for reliable assessments was calculated. A total of 613 evaluations were completed by 66 residents (85.7% response rate). 99 faculty (86.8% response rate) participated in self-evaluation. Factor analysis yielded five scales with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha for residents' and faculty): learning climate (0.86 and 0.75), professional attitude (0.89 and 0.81), communication of learning goals (0.89 and 0.82), evaluation of residents (0.87 and 079) and feedback (0.87 and 0.86). Item-total, inter-scale and scale-global rating correlation coefficients were significant (P < 0.01). Four to six residents' evaluations are needed per faculty (reliability coefficient 0.60-0.80). Conclusions: Both SETQ instruments were found reliable and valid for evaluating teaching qualities of obstetrics and gynecology faculty. Future research should examine improvement of teaching qualities when using SETQ.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF FACULTY TEACHING AND STUDENT KNOWLEDGE IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
    NOZER, N
    MASHIACH, S
    DAVID, A
    SERR, DM
    HAREFUAH, 1978, 94 (5-6) : 184 - 185
  • [2] IMPROVEMENT OF FACULTY TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN A DEPARTMENT OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY BY STUDENT EVALUATION
    SALL, S
    GROMISCH, DS
    RUBIN, SH
    STONE, ML
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 124 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [3] Quantifying faculty teaching time in a department of obstetrics and gynecology
    Emmons, S
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04): : 633 - 638
  • [4] Reliability and validity of reflection exercises for obstetrics and gynecology residents
    Learman, Lee A.
    Autry, Amy M.
    O'Sullivan, Patricia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (04) : 461.e1 - 461.e10
  • [5] Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology
    Johnson, Natasha R.
    Chen, Jie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (05) : 1479 - 1483
  • [6] Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ Smart)
    Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
    Ferguson, Andrew
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Malling, Bente
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 125 (05) : 1056 - 1065
  • [7] New Tools for Systematic Evaluation of Teaching Qualities of Medical Faculty: Results of an Ongoing Multi-Center Survey
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    Hoekstra, Joost B. L.
    Bos, Albert P.
    Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (10):
  • [9] EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE TEACHING CURRICULUM FOR OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
    Polisetti, Suniti
    Rama, R. Vidya
    Usha, Prasad
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (84): : 14636 - 14640
  • [10] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) in Graduate Medical Training
    Boerebach, Benjamin C. M.
    Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2016, 39 (01) : 21 - 32