Fostering gender equality and reproductive and sexual health among adolescents: results from a quasi-experimental study in Northern Uganda

Objective To assess the impact of the Gender Roles, Equality and Transformations (GREAT) intervention: a narrative-based, resource-light, life-stage tailored intervention package designed to promote gender-equitable attitudes and behaviours, and improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among adolescents and their communities. Design Repeated cross-sectional evaluation study, using propensity score matching combined with difference-in-difference estimation. Setting Two postconflict communities in Lira and Amuru districts in Northern Uganda. Participants Male and female unmarried adolescents (10-14 years, 15-19 years), married adolescents (15-19 years) and adults (over the age of 19 years) were selected using a stratified, two-stage cluster sample of primary and secondary schools and households (baseline: n=2464, endline: n=2449). Primary outcome measures Inequitable gender attitudes and behaviours; GBV; and SRH knowledge and behaviours. Results Statistically significant intervention effects were seen across all three outcomes-gender equity, GBV and SRH-among older and newly married adolescents and adults. Among older adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: inequitable gender attitudes scale score: -4.2 points ((95% CI -7.1 to -1.4), p<0.05); Inequitable household roles scale score: -11.8 ((95% CI -15.6to -7.9), p<0.05); Inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: -1.9 ((95% CI -5.0 to -0.2), p<0.05); per cent of boys who sexually assaulted a girl in past 3 months: -7.7 ((95% CI -13.1 to -2.3), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: -10.1 ((95% CI -12.9 to -7.3), p<0.05). Among married adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: Inequitable household roles scale score: -6.5 ((95% CI -10.8 to -2.2), p<0.05); inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: -4.7 ((95% CI -9.8 to -0.3), p<0.05); per cent who reacted violently to their partner: -15.7 ((95% CI -27.1 to -4.4), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: -12.9 ((95% CI -17.3 to -8.5), p<0.05). Conclusion The GREAT intervention model demonstrates the promise of a resource-light, life-stage tailored programme that employs culturally appropriate, participatory and narrative-based techniques to advance gender equity and adolescent health. This type of programming contributes towards reductions in GBV and improved adolescent SRH outcomes.