The Safety of Perioperative Esmolol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:53
|
作者
Yu, Savio K. H. [1 ]
Tait, Gordon [1 ]
Karkouti, Keyvan [1 ]
Wijeysundera, Duminda [1 ]
McCluskey, Stuart [1 ]
Beattie, W. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2011年 / 112卷 / 02期
关键词
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; INDUCED CONTROLLED HYPOTENSION; HEART-RATE CONTROL; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; SODIUM-NITROPRUSSIDE; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; ANESTHETIC REQUIREMENT; ATTENUATES TACHYCARDIA; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182025af7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although beta blockers have been found to decrease perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), beta-blocker-mediated hypotension is associated with postoperative stroke and mortality. In this systematic review we assessed the safety and efficacy of the beta 1-specific, adrenergic receptor antagonist esmolol in noncardiac surgery. Safety was assessed by analyzing the incidence of postoperative hypotension and bradycardia, and efficacy was assessed by analyzing the incidence of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for randomized placebo-controlled trials of the perioperative use of esmolol in noncardiac surgery. We abstracted data on design, demographics, hemodynamic changes (planned or unplanned), myocardial ischemia, and MI. Heterogeneity was assessed via meta-regression. RESULTS: Our search identified 67 trials, which were well matched for study characteristics. The quality of the studies was limited by small sample size and poorly defined allocation concealment. Overall, the analysis demonstrates an increased incidence of unplanned hypotension (OR 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 3.04), which was found to be dose related (R-2 = 0.408). An increased incidence of significant bradycardia was not demonstrated (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 0.69 to 2.02). Dose titration was shown to influence both the change in arterial blood pressure and heart rate. In comparison with placebo, esmolol decreased the frequency of myocardial ischemia in the 7 evaluating studies (OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.45). We did not assess the effects of esmolol on the incidence of MI or stroke because the incidence of these events was too infrequent in the retrieved studies. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that titration of esmolol to a hemodynamic end point can be safe and effective. Safety data from studies in higher-risk patients are needed to establish a perioperative safety and efficacy profile of esmolol. (Anesth Analg 2011;112:267-81)
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Po
    Zheng, Xiangchun
    Liu, Zhi
    Fang, Xiaolei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [2] Perioperative insulin infusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gandhi, Gunjan Y.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Flynn, David N.
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Nielsen, Henning Bay
    Cavalcante, Alexandre B.
    Montori, Victor M.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2007, 56 : A144 - A144
  • [3] The Safety of Yoga: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Ward, Lesley
    Saper, Robert
    Fishbein, Daniel
    Dobos, Gustav
    Lauche, Romy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 182 (04) : 281 - 293
  • [4] Safety of acupuncture in oncology: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hoxtermann, Melanie D.
    Haller, Heidemarie
    Aboudamaah, Shaimaa
    Bachemir, Armin
    Dobos, Gustav
    Cramer, Holger
    Voiss, Petra
    [J]. CANCER, 2022, 128 (11) : 2159 - 2173
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila Nabil Mahmoud Helmy
    Abou-Setta, Ahamed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 329 - 330
  • [6] Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Frederik Bjerg Clausen
    Niclas Dohrn
    Emma Rosenkrantz Hölmich
    Mads Klein
    Ismail Gögenur
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 203 - 212
  • [7] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF NITAZOXANIDE ON DIARRHEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Hashan, Mohammad
    Elhusseiny, Khaled
    Le, Huu
    Hien Tong Thi Thu
    Thuan Minh Tieu
    Low, Soon
    Thai Le Ba Nghia
    Nhu, Mai
    Eid, Peter
    Nguyen, Phuong
    Loc Quang Le
    Abed, Mohammed
    Le Huu Nhat Minh
    Hirayama, Kenji
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (04): : 369 - 370
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Oncolytic Viruses in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zengbin
    Jiang, Zeju
    Zhang, Yingxuan
    Huang, Xiaotian
    Liu, Qiong
    [J]. CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [9] The effect and safety of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Junjie Lin
    Yu Zhang
    Kunyi Wang
    Junping Wang
    Shuo Kou
    Kan Chen
    Weijun Zheng
    Rucheng Chen
    [J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2023, 62 : 2709 - 2721
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of lorcaserin in obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Singh, Awadhesh Kumar
    Singh, Ritu
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 13 (02) : 183 - 190