A Detailed Comparison of Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods for RC Buildings

被引:5
|
作者
Erdil, Baris [1 ]
Ceylan, Harun [2 ]
机构
[1] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Van, Turkey
[2] Natl Educ Directorate, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Siirt, Turkey
关键词
Tier; 2; evaluation; Preliminary evaluation; Seismic performance; Reinforced concrete building; Vulnerability;
D O I
10.1007/s40996-019-00234-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Tier 2 (preliminary) evaluation methods seem to be efficient in determining seismic vulnerability of buildings in large building stocks because they can be used to determine the seismic performance of a single building when compared to Tier 1 evaluation methods (street survey). Besides, they require less time as opposed to detailed evaluation methods (Tier 3). Eleven preliminary vulnerability analysis procedures are compared considering the data of 192 buildings experienced either 2011 Van Earthquakes, 2003 Bingol Earthquake or 2002 Afyon Earthquake. Comparisons are made in terms of the number of parameters, influence of parameters on final seismic score, weighing factors of the parameters, the success rate of predicting the seismic performance of the examined buildings. Investigated procedures use at least four parameters and at most 22 parameters. Although number of stories have adverse effect on the seismic performance, concrete strength, area of shear walls and columns seem to have positive effect. Among the main parameters used in all procedures, area of shear walls is found to be the most influential parameter; however, concrete strength is one of the least effective parameters. As for the rate of correct vulnerability estimate of the 192 buildings, it is found that the best prediction rate belongs to Sucuoglu and Yazgan (in Wasti and Ozcebe (eds) Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings, NATO science series (series IV: earth and environmental sciences), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2003) with 79.2%. All the procedures except Ozcebe et al. (in Wasti and Ozcebe (eds) Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings, NATO science series (series IV: earth and environmental sciences), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2003) have correct estimate rate equal to or higher than 63%.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 725
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Detailed Comparison of Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods for RC Buildings
    Barış Erdil
    Harun Ceylan
    [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2019, 43 : 711 - 725
  • [2] Assessment indices for the seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings
    Thermou, G. E.
    Pantazopoulou, S. J.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (03): : 293 - 313
  • [3] Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity
    Mouhine, Mohamed
    Hilali, Elmokhtar
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [4] A detailed seismic performance assessment procedure for RC frame buildings
    Yakut, Ahmet
    Erduran, Emrah
    [J]. ADVANCES IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING FOR URBAN RISK REDUCTION, 2006, 66 : 135 - +
  • [5] MVP interaction based seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings
    Erdil, Baris
    Ceylan, Harun
    [J]. GRADEVINAR, 2019, 71 (06): : 489 - 503
  • [6] Seismic vulnerability assessment of precast RC industrial buildings in Turkey
    Yesilyurt, Ali
    Zulfikar, A. Can
    Tuzun, Cuneyt
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 141
  • [7] Preliminary assessment approach to predict seismic vulnerability of existing low and mid-rise RC buildings
    Hakan Dilmaç
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18 : 3101 - 3133
  • [8] Buildings' seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study
    Alam, N.
    Alam, M. Shahria
    Tesfamariam, S.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 62 (02) : 405 - 424
  • [9] Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study
    N. Alam
    M. Shahria Alam
    S. Tesfamariam
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62 : 405 - 424
  • [10] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Indian Code Compliant RC Frame Buildings
    Gondaliya, Kaushik M.
    Amin, Jignesh
    Bhaiya, Vishisht
    Vasanwala, Sandip
    Desai, Atul K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 11 (01) : 207 - 231