Clinical, Pathological, and Prognostic Analysis of Urachal Carcinoma

被引:8
|
作者
Shao, Guangjun [1 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunru [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Jikai [1 ]
Li, Xuesong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Luchao [1 ]
Li, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoqing [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fan, Yidong [1 ]
Zhou, Liqun [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Urol, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Inst Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Urol Canc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peoples Hosp Fushan Dist, Dept Urol, Yantai 265500, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Urachal carcinoma; Extended partial cystectomy; Prognosis; High-risk TNM stage; Positive surgical margin; Adjuvant therapy; SURVIVAL; CANCER; ADENOCARCINOMAS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1159/000518028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to improve understanding the clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of urachal carcinoma (UrC), a retrospectively descriptive study was done in 2 clinical centers. Methods: After excluding the 2 missed patients, the clinical and pathological data of 59 patients with UrC, who were diagnosed or treated at 2 clinical centers between 1986 and 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. SPSS 22.0 (IBM) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 were used for statistics and data visualization. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression were performed for find risk factors on predicting the prognosis. Results: Of all 59 patients, 47 were male and 12 were female. The median age at diagnosis was 51.6 years (range: 22-84 years). Gross hematuria was the most common symptom (79.66%). The majority of urachal neoplasms were adenocarcinomas (94.92%). Forty-two patients (72.41%) underwent extended partial cystectomy with en bloc resection of the entire urachus. The mean follow-up was 52 months (3-277 months). Median overall survival was 52.8 months (4-93 months). The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate and 5-year CSS rate were 69.1% and 61.2%. There was no significant difference among localized T stage, tumor histologic grade and surgical procedures in determining prognosis by survival analyze. While patients with high-risk TNM stage (local abdominal metastasis, lymph node metastasis, or distant metastasis) (p = 0.003) and positive surgical margin (p < 0.001) had significantly worse prognosis. Conclusions: The results indicate that high-risk TNM stage and positive surgical margin are risk predictors of prognosis. Localized T stage, histologic grade, and surgical procedure cause no significant effect on patient prognosis. The extended partial cystectomy is the recommended surgical approach for patients with UrC. Active multimodal treatments may improve the survival of patients with recurrent and metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with urachal carcinoma
    Bruins, H. M.
    Visser, O.
    Ploeg, M.
    Hulsbergen-Vandekaa, C.
    Witjes, J. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E718 - U528
  • [2] The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Qin, LX
    Tang, ZY
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 8 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [3] The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Lun-Xiu Qin Zhao-You Tang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002, 8 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [4] Prognostic factors of primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinical and pathological analysis of 34 cases
    Jiang, Li
    Li, Pengfei
    Xiao, Zizheng
    Qiu, Huijuan
    Zhang, Xinke
    Xiao, Yongbo
    Zhang, Bei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (10): : 6792 - 6799
  • [5] CLINICAL FEATURES AND TREATMENT OF URACHAL CARCINOMA
    GODDE, S
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1968, 23 (06) : 519 - &
  • [6] Clinical case of urachal carcinoma treatment
    Nurgaliyev, N. S.
    Ukolova, E. A.
    Satbaeva, E. B.
    Aydarkulov, A. A.
    Rakhimov, G. T.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2024, 20 (01): : 140 - 145
  • [7] Clinical and pathological prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma.
    Tovazzi, Valeria
    Lorini, Luigi
    Battocchio, Simonetta
    Zannoni, Marina
    Paolino, Gaetano
    Cingarlini, Sara
    Zamparini, Manuel
    Tomasoni, Michele
    Ravanelli, Marco
    Oberti, Arianna
    Grammatica, Alberto
    Buglione, Michela
    Magrini, Stefano M.
    Maroldi, Roberto
    Piazza, Cesare
    Facchetti, Fabio
    Scarpa, Aldo
    Berruti, Alfredo
    Bossi, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [8] Clinical and pathological prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Hanozet, Francesco
    Ditto, Antonino
    Solima, Eugenio
    Zanaboni, Flavia
    Vecchione, Francesca
    Kusamura, Shigeki
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 102 (02) : 333 - 337
  • [9] Clinical and pathological prognostic indicators in colorectal mucinous carcinoma.
    Kubota, K
    Akasu, T
    Fujita, S
    Moriya, Y
    Shimoda, T
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A630 - A630
  • [10] Prognostic factors in floor of the mouth carcinoma: Multifactorial analysis of demographic, clinical, pathological and therapeutic variables
    Biazolla, ER
    Kowalski, LP
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, VOL V, 1997, : 116 - 119