Twin Variant Naval Ship Concept Design

被引:0
|
作者
Khan, Imran [1 ]
机构
[1] Pakistan Navy, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The warships are designed over a period of 2 to 5 years. The sister ships may continue to be built up to 15 years from the class ship (first of a kind) getting into service, with little design modifications and improvements. The requirement of a common hull design has emerged, more important than ever, in light of worldwide trend of curtailing defense budgets and increasing focus to extract maximum out of a single design through modular approach. Utilizing modular concept a single optimized hull will be designed; and the two variants will have a major difference of a plug only. The types of hullform considered are both conventional and unconventional. The common capabilities, payload and space arrangement are similar on both variant V1 & V2. Major advantages of a common hull design are reduced design & build costs, ease of personnel training, ease of maintenance and common support infrastructure including inventory management. Though the commonality of hull forms and system architecture will add design and build complexity, the advantages to be gained are numerous. The enhanced capabilities and payload are provided in V1 through addition of a plug, whereas the low end V2 variant is envisaged to have a high export potential due to marginally low cost.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 581
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DESIGN TO COST - VIABLE CONCEPT IN NAVAL SHIP DESIGN
    GRAHAM, C
    NICKELSBURG, M
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1976, 88 (02) : 216 - 233
  • [2] DESIGN-TO-COST - VIABLE CONCEPT IN NAVAL SHIP DESIGN
    GRAHAM, C
    NICKELSBURG, M
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1976, 88 (03) : 110 - 111
  • [3] Still Reengineering the Naval Ship Concept Design Process
    Brown, Alan
    Waltham-Sajdak, John
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2015, 127 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [4] Exploration of System Vulnerability in Naval Ship Concept Design
    Goodfriend, David
    Brown, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF SHIP PRODUCTION AND DESIGN, 2018, 34 (01): : 42 - 58
  • [5] A comprehensive approach to survivability assessment in naval ship concept design
    Piperakis, A.S.
    Andrews, D.J.
    Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2014, 156 : 375 - 376
  • [6] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A. S.
    Andrews, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2014, 156 : A333 - A352
  • [7] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A.S.
    Andrews, D.J.
    Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2014, 156 (A4):
  • [8] A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SURVIVABILITY ASSESSMENT IN NAVAL SHIP CONCEPT DESIGN
    Piperakis, A. S.
    Andrews, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2014, 156 : A375 - A378
  • [9] Concept Exploration Process, Methodology and Design Tools for Teaching Naval Ship Design
    Brown, Alan J.
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2022, 134 (04) : 79 - 90
  • [10] A Pioneer of Naval Ship Design
    Andrews, David
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2020, 15 (05) : 468 - 473