共 50 条
Factors associated with cultures of assessment at US schools and colleges of pharmacy
被引:5
|作者:
Lee, Kelly C.
[1
]
Rudolph, Michael J.
[2
]
Assemi, Mitra
[3
]
Bray, Brenda S.
[4
]
Daugherty, Kimberly K.
[5
]
Karpen, Samuel C.
[6
]
Maerten-Rivera, Jaime L.
[7
]
Pavuluri, Nina
[8
]
Sease, Julie M.
[9
]
Vellurattil, Rosalyn P.
[10
]
Weck, Margaret A.
[11
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, 9500 Gilman Dr,MC 0657, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, 549 Patterson Off Tower, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Pharm, 155 N Fresno Str,Suite 224, Fresno, CA 93701 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Coll Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, 205 East Spokane Falls Blvd,POB 1495, Spokane, WA 99210 USA
[5] Sullivan Univ, Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, 2100 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY 40205 USA
[6] East Tennessee State Univ, Gatton Coll Pharm, Maple Ave,Bldg 7,Rm 202, Mountain Home, TN 37684 USA
[7] Univ Buffalo, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, 280 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[8] Lake Erie Coll Osteopath Med, Sch Pharm, 5000 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211 USA
[9] Presbyterian Coll, Sch Pharm, 307 North Broad St, Clinton, SC 29325 USA
[10] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, 833 S Wood St M-C 874,184E, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[11] St Louis Coll Pharm, 4588 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词:
Culture;
Assessment;
Faculty engagement;
Support;
Pharmacy;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.003
中图分类号:
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号:
040101 ;
120403 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Pharmacy education has standards for assessment that must be met, prompting many programs to develop cultures of assessment. This study assesses the extent to which assessment personnel perceive that a culture of assessment has been established within their schools/colleges of pharmacy (S/COPs) and determines whether a relationship exists between assessment structure and the perceived strength of the culture of assessment. Methods: An electronic survey was administered to assessment personnel at 134 S/COPs. Respondents were asked about changes within the past five years pertaining to assessment personnel/committees and factors prompting these changes. They were also asked to rate items related to support for institutional assessment (SIA scale) and faculty engagement with assessment (FEA scale). The reliability of each scale was estimated using Cronbach alpha and bivariate correlations were conducted to estimate the relationships among the two scales and other survey items. Results: The S/COP response rate was 84% (113/134). Most (58%) noted the formation or restructuring of the assessment office, with 26% creating one or more new assessment positions. The most common source of change was new accreditation standards (55%) followed by a new leadership position created in assessment (40%). Cronbach alpha for the SIA scale was 0.79 and 0.84 for the FEA scale. Program size was strongly negatively correlated with school age (r(s) = -0.58) and the FEA scale (r = -0.21). Conclusions: There was a strong relationship between SIA and FEA. Future studies are warranted to determine the interdependency of support for assessment and faculty engagement with assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 138
页数:10
相关论文