Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry

被引:46
|
作者
Furr, Nathan [1 ]
Kapoor, Rahul [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Strategy Area, Fontainebleau, France
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Management Dept, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
dominant design; exit mode; industry evolution; pre-entry capabilities; shakeout; technology competition; PRE-ENTRY EXPERIENCE; DOMINANT DESIGNS; OPPORTUNITY COSTS; DE-NOVO; INNOVATION; EVOLUTION; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2709
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Summary: Explanations of entrants' survival in an emerging industry are premised on pre-entry capabilities or technology entry choices prior to the emergence of the dominant design. We consider how these drivers interact to strengthen or nullify firms' pre-entry advantage, and facilitate adaptation as the industry evolves. We also expand the treatment of exit by separating dissolution from acquisition, in which firms' capabilities continue to be utilized in the industry. Studying a recent shakeout in the global solar photovoltaic industry, we find that pre-entry capabilities and technology choices act in a complementary manner for some firms, thereby enhancing survival, and as buffers against exit for others. Nearly half of exits were via acquisitions, and technology choice at entry played an important role in determining how firms exited. Managerial Summary: New industries are often characterized by intense technology competition that culminates in a dominant technology followed by industry shakeout. Although prior research underscores the central role of technology choice and firm capabilities to survival, we do not actually know how firms with different capabilities and who have made competing technology choices survive an industry shakeout. In this article, we show how entrants' capabilities and technology choices can act in a complementary manner for some firms, enhancing their chance of survival, and as buffers against failure for others. Moreover, we explain why some firms that do exit are acquired, when others are dissolved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 61
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unpacking Firm Exit at the Firm and Industry Levels: The Adaptation and Selection of Firm Capabilities
    Fortune, Annetta
    Mitchell, Will
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (07) : 794 - 819
  • [2] Government Policy and Firm Strategy in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry
    Haley, Usha C. V.
    Schuler, Douglas A.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 54 (01) : 17 - +
  • [3] Innovation and production in the global solar photovoltaic industry
    Show-Ling Jang
    Li-Ju Chen
    Jennifer H. Chen
    Yu-Chieh Chiu
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94 : 1021 - 1036
  • [4] Innovation and production in the global solar photovoltaic industry
    Jang, Show-Ling
    Chen, Li-Ju
    Chen, Jennifer H.
    Chiu, Yu-Chieh
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (03) : 1021 - 1036
  • [5] New technologies and employment: industry and firm level evidence from Turkey
    Ansal, HK
    Karaomerlioglu, DC
    [J]. NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 1999, 14 (02) : 82 - 99
  • [6] Product location choice and firm capabilities: Evidence from the US automobile industry
    Thomas, L
    Weigelt, K
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (09) : 897 - 909
  • [7] Dynamic and marketing capabilities as determinants of firm performance: evidence from automotive industry
    Cataltepe, Veysel
    Kamasak, Rifat
    Bulutlar, Fusun
    Alkan, Deniz Palalar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 17 (03) : 617 - 638
  • [8] The competitive effects of firm exit Evidence from the U.S. airline industry
    Hueschelrath, Kai
    Mueller, Kathrin
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2013, 2 (2-3) : 72 - 85
  • [9] Competing in the Global Solar Photovoltaic Industry: The Case of Taiwan
    Su, Yu-Shan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2013, 2013
  • [10] Does A Firm's Entry or Exit Affect Competitors' Value? Evidence from the REIT Industry
    Chan, Su Han
    Chen, Jiajin
    Wang, Ko
    [J]. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2019, 47 (01) : 214 - 262