Treatment Summaries and Follow-Up Care Instructions for Cancer Survivors: Improving Survivor Self-Efficacy and Health Care Utilization

被引:26
|
作者
Kenzik, Kelly M. [1 ,2 ]
Kvale, Elizabeth A. [3 ]
Rocque, Gabrielle B. [2 ,3 ]
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy [3 ]
Martin, Michelle Y. [3 ,4 ]
Jackson, Bradford E. [4 ]
Meneses, Karen [3 ,5 ]
Partridge, Edward E. [3 ]
Pisu, Maria [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Inst Canc Outcomes & Survivorship, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Hematol & Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2016年 / 21卷 / 07期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Cancer; Survivorship; Self-efficacy; Disease management; PLANS; IMPACT; LIFE;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0517
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Treatment summaries and follow-up care plan information should be provided to cancer survivors. This study examines the association of receiving summaries and care plans with cancer survivor self-efficacy for chronic illness management, and whether self-efficacy was associated with health care utilization. Methods. Four hundred forty-one cancer survivors (>= 2 years from diagnosis and had completed treatment) >= 65 years old from 12 cancer centers across 5 states completed telephone surveys. Survivors responded to three questions about receiving a written treatment summary, written follow-up plan, and an explanation of follow-up care plans. Respondents completed the Stanford Chronic Illness Management Self-Efficacy Scale and reported emergency room visits and hospitalizations in the past year. Three multiple linear regression models estimated the association of written treatment summary, written follow-up care plan, and verbal explanation of follow-up plan with total self-efficacy score. Log-binomial models estimated the association of self-efficacy scores with emergency room visits and hospitalizations (yes/no). Results. Among survivors, 40% and 35% received a written treatment summary and follow-up care plan, respectively. Seventy-nine percent received an explanation of follow-up care plans. Receiving a verbal explanation of follow-up care instructions was significantly associated with higher self-efficacy scores (beta = 0.72, p = .009). Higher self-efficacy scores were significantly associated with lower prevalence ratios of emergency room visits (prevalence ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97) and hospitalizations (prevalence ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.99). Conclusion. Explanation of the follow-up care plan, beyond the written component, enhances survivor self-efficacy for managing cancer as a chronic condition-an important mediator for improving health care utilization outcomes. Implications for Practice: Older cancer survivors (. 65 years) are especially vulnerable to poor outcomes in survivorship because of the complexity of follow-up care and other chronic conditions. Delivering written treatment summaries, written follow-up care plans, and verbal explanations of follow-up care plans all independently increased the self-efficacy for chronic illness management among older survivors. In particular, delivering this information in the verbal format was significantly associated with higher self-efficacy and, subsequently, a lower likelihood of emergency roomvisits. Understanding the mechanism through which summaries and follow-up care plans may positively influence survivor health is critical to increasing the delivery of the information.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 824
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条