A Mixed Scheme for Subgrid-Scale Fluxes in Cloud-Resolving Models

被引:49
|
作者
Moeng, C-H [1 ]
Sullivan, P. P.
Khairoutdinov, M. F. [2 ]
Randall, D. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, MMM Div, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; ATMOSPHERIC SURFACE-LAYER; TURBULENCE MODELS; FLOWS; HATS;
D O I
10.1175/2010JAS3565.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A large domain large eddy simulation of a tropical deep convection system is used as a benchmark to derive and test a mixed subgrid scale (SGS) scheme for scalar and momentum fluxes in cloud resolving models (CRMs) The benchmark simulation resolves a broad range of scales ranging from mesoscale organisations through gravity waves and individual clouds down to energy containing turbulent eddies A spectral analysis shows that the vertical velocity kinetic energy peaks at scales from hundreds of meters in the lower cloud layer to several kilometers higher up these scales ire typical grid sizes of today s CRMs The analysis also shows that a significant portion of the scalar and momentum fluxes in the benchmark simulation are carried by motions smaller than several kilometers (i e smaller than a typical grid resolution of CRMs) The broad range of scales of the benchmark simulation is split into two components filter scale (mimicking CRM re solvable scale) and subfilter scale (mimicking CRM SOS) using filter widths characteristic of a typical CRM grid spacing The local relationship of the subfilter scale fluxes to the filter scale variables is examined This leads to a mixed SGS scheme to represent the SOS fluxes of scalars and momentum in CRMs A priori tests show that the mixed SOS scheme yields spatial distributions of subfilter scale fluxes that correlate much better with those retrieved from the benchmark when compared with an eddy viscosity/diffusivity scheme that is commonly used in today s CRMs
引用
收藏
页码:3692 / 3705
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Closure for Updraft-Downdraft Representation of Subgrid-Scale Fluxes in Cloud-Resolving Models
    Moeng, Chin-Hoh
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (02) : 703 - 715
  • [2] A simplified PDF parameterization of subgrid-scale clouds and turbulence for cloud-resolving models
    Bogenschutz, Peter A.
    Krueger, Steven K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2013, 5 (02) : 195 - 211
  • [3] Importance of the subgrid-scale turbulent moist process: Cloud distribution in global cloud-resolving simulations
    Noda, Akira T.
    Oouchi, Kazuyoshi
    Satoh, Masaki
    Tomita, Hirofumi
    Iga, Shin-ichi
    Tsushima, Yoko
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (2-3) : 208 - 217
  • [4] Evaluation of Subgrid-Scale Hydrometeor Transport Schemes Using a High-Resolution Cloud-Resolving Model
    Wong, May
    Ovchinnikov, Mikhail
    Wang, Minghuai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2015, 72 (09) : 3715 - 3731
  • [5] Modelling of subgrid-scale fluxes
    Wang, Liqiu
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2007, 34 (02) : 368 - 375
  • [6] Using a cloud-resolving model to study the effects of subgrid-scale variations in relative humidity on direct sulphate-aerosol forcing
    Petch, JC
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 127 (577) : 2385 - 2394
  • [7] Filtered subgrid-scale models
    Sagaut, P
    Comte, P
    Ducros, F
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2000, 12 (01) : 233 - 236
  • [8] Global Cloud-Resolving Models
    Satoh, Masaki
    Stevens, Bjorn
    Judt, Falko
    Khairoutdinov, Marat
    Lin, Shian-Jiann
    Putman, William M.
    Duben, Peter
    [J]. CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2019, 5 (03) : 172 - 184
  • [9] Global Cloud-Resolving Models
    Masaki Satoh
    Bjorn Stevens
    Falko Judt
    Marat Khairoutdinov
    Shian-Jiann Lin
    William M. Putman
    Peter Düben
    [J]. Current Climate Change Reports, 2019, 5 : 172 - 184
  • [10] The parameterization of subgrid-scale cloud by renormalization methods
    Cairns, B
    [J]. SEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON GLOBAL CHANGE STUDIES, 1996, : 152 - 155