Abdominal Closure and the Risk of Incisional Hernia in Aneurysm Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Nicolajsen, Chalotte W. [1 ]
Eldrup, Nikolaj [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Soendre Skovvej 15, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Abdominal closure; Incisional hernia; Open surgery; Review; AORTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; MIDLINE INCISIONS; WALL HERNIA; TRANSPERITONEAL APPROACH; DOUBLE-BLIND; DISEASE; MESH; RETROPERITONEAL; REINFORCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.041
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have a high prevalence of incisional hernia following open repair. The choice of incision and closure technique has a significant impact on this postoperative complication. Multiple techniques exist, as well as various comparative analyses, but clinical consensus is lacking. The objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of AAA laparotomy and closure technique and the risk of incisional hernia development. Methods: The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search of all original research published until January 2019 was made. Outcome measures were surgical approach, closure technique, hernia rates, length of follow up, and method of hernia recognition. Groups were divided according to method of abdominal incision and closure technique. Differences in outcome between closure techniques were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Results: Fifteen studies were included with a cumulative cohort of between 388 and 3 399 patients compared in each group. Abdominal closure with a suture to wound length ratio of more than 4:1 compared with less than 4:1, RR 0.42 (95% CI 0.27-0.65), and abdominal closure with mesh compared with without mesh augmentation, RR 0.24 (95% CI 0.10-0.60) reduced the risk of incisional hernia. There were no significant differences in incisional hernia rate between transverse abdominal incision vs. vertical midline incision, RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.31-1.06) and between midline transperitoneal vs. all retroperitoneal incisions, RR 1.19 (95% CI 0.54-2.61). Conclusion: Choice of abdominal closure technique after aneurysm surgery impacts the risk of developing incisional hernia. The use of a supportive mesh significantly reduces the risk of incisional hernia in vertical midline incisions. The same is true if a suture to wound ratio of more than 4:1 is used.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 236
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mahajan, Nandita N.
    da Silveira, Carlos Andre Balthazar
    Kasmirski, Julia Adriana
    Lima, Diego Laurentino
    Lech, Gabriele Eckerdt
    Moraes, Luiza Bertolli Lucchese
    Sturmer, Carolina Moronte
    Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
    Sreeramoju, Prashanth
    [J]. HERNIA, 2024,
  • [2] Incisional Hernia Rates After Laparoscopic or Open Abdominal Surgery—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Julia B. Kössler-Ebs
    Kathrin Grummich
    Katrin Jensen
    Felix J. Hüttner
    Beat Müller-Stich
    Christoph M. Seiler
    Phillip Knebel
    Markus W. Büchler
    Markus K. Diener
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 2319 - 2330
  • [3] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Incisional Hernia at the Site of Stoma Closure
    Aneel Bhangu
    Dmitri Nepogodiev
    Kaori Futaba
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2012, 36 : 973 - 983
  • [4] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Incisional Hernia at the Site of Stoma Closure
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Futaba, Kaori
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (05) : 973 - 983
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia in urological surgery
    Alises, Enrique Calcerrada
    Rodriguez, Cristina Anton
    Pedrique, Manuel Medina
    Berrevoet, Frederick
    Cuccurullo, Diego
    Cano, Manuel Lopez
    Stabilini, Cesare
    Garcia-Urena, Miguel Angel
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)
  • [6] Incisional Hernia Rates After Laparoscopic or Open Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Koessler-Ebs, Julia B.
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Jensen, Katrin
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Mueller-Stich, Beat
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    Knebel, Phillip
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (10) : 2319 - 2330
  • [7] An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure
    C. Stabilini
    M.A. Garcia-Urena
    F. Berrevoet
    D. Cuccurullo
    S. Capoccia Giovannini
    M. Dajko
    L. Rossi
    K. Decaestecker
    M. López Cano
    [J]. Hernia, 2022, 26 : 411 - 436
  • [8] An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure
    Stabilini, C.
    Garcia-Urena, M. A.
    Berrevoet, F.
    Cuccurullo, D.
    Capoccia Giovannini, S.
    Dajko, M.
    Rossi, L.
    Decaestecker, K.
    Lopez Cano, M.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2022, 26 (02) : 411 - 436
  • [9] Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramirez-Giraldo, Camilo
    Van-Londono, Isabella
    Monroy, Danny Conde
    Navarro-Alean, Jorge
    Hernandez-Ferreira, Juliana
    Hernandez-Alvarez, Daniela
    Rojas-Lopez, Susana
    Avendano-Morales, Violeta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [10] Risk factors associated to incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo
    Isabella Van-Londoño
    Danny Conde Monroy
    Jorge Navarro-Alean
    Juliana Hernández-Ferreira
    Daniela Hernández-Álvarez
    Susana Rojas-López
    Violeta Avendaño-Morales
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38