Intravenous esomeprazole versus pantoprazole for heartburn A randomized controlled double-blind trial

被引:0
|
作者
Karakayali, O. [1 ]
Yilmaz, S. [2 ]
Karakayali, A. [3 ]
Yigit, Yavuz [1 ]
Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit [1 ]
Uslu, Tolga [1 ]
机构
[1] Human Hlth Univ, Derince Training & Res Hosp, Emergency Med Dept, Kocaeli, Turkey
[2] Kocaeli Fac Med Univ, Emergency Med Dept, Kocaeli, Turkey
[3] Human Hlth Univ, Derince Training & Res Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Kocaeli, Turkey
来源
NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN | 2020年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
Pain; Gastritis; Visual analog scale; Gastroesophageal reflux; Emergency medicine; LANSOPRAZOLE; 30; MG; ACID CONTROL; OMEPRAZOLE; ESOPHAGITIS; RABEPRAZOLE; DYSPEPSIA; PROVIDES; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1007/s10049-019-0626-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Heartburn is one of the most common symptoms of gastrointestinal diseases. Intravenous (IV) administration of pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for short-term acute treatment. Although there are many studies on these drugs in the literature, they are frequently related to long-term oral use and changes in intragastric pH. Objective This study compared the effects of IV esomeprazole with those of IV pantoprazole in patients presenting to the emergency department with heartburn. Materials and methods For this randomized controlled double-blind trial, patients aged over 18 years presenting with gastritis-related heartburn were eligible. Study patients received 40 & x202f;mg esomeprazole or pantoprazole in 100 & x202f;ml normal saline. Pain intensity was measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30, 60, and 120 min. Patients were randomized and assigned to either of the two study arms via closed envelopes. Results Finally, 205 patients were randomized (esomeprazole: 104; pantoprazole 101). Mean age was 39.1 & x202f;+/- 13.78 years and 48.8% were male. Both esomeprazole (median VAS: 26 & x202f;mm, interquartile range [IQR]: 17-38 & x202f;mm) and pantoprazole (median: 24 & x202f;mm, IQR: 14.5-36 & x202f;mm) effectively reduced heartburn at 30 & x202f;min, 60 & x202f;min (median: 59.5 & x202f;mm, IQR: 48-73.5 & x202f;mm vs. 55 & x202f;mm, IQR: 33-68.5 & x202f;mm), and 120 & x202f;min (median: 80 & x202f;mm, IQR: 66.5-89.8 & x202f;mm vs. 77 & x202f;mm, IQR: 56-85 & x202f;mm). While there was no statistically significant difference between the two drugs at 30 min (p & x202f;= 0.312), there was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity between the esomeprazole and pantoprazole groups at 60 and 120 min (p & x202f;= 0.014,p & x202f;= 0.02, respectively). Conclusion Single-dose slow IV infusion of esomeprazole is faster and more effective in controlling heartburn than pantoprazole.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 281
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravenous esomeprazole versus pantoprazole for heartburn: A randomized controlled double-blind trial; [Intravenöses Esomeprazol vs. Pantoprazol bei Sodbrennen: Eine randomisierte, kontrollierte, doppelblinde Studie]
    Karakayali O.
    Yilmaz S.
    Karakayali A.
    Yigit Y.
    Halhalli H.C.
    Uslu T.
    [J]. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin, 2020, 23 (4) : 276 - 281
  • [2] Effects of Tegoprazan Versus Esomeprazole on Nighttime Heartburn and Sleep Quality in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Seo, Seung In
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Lee, Sang Kil
    Kim, Ah Rong
    Park, Hyun Wook
    Kim, Bong Tae
    Song, Geun Seog
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 29 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [3] Esomeprazole Treatment of Frequent Heartburn: Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Peura, David A.
    Traxler, Barry
    Kocun, Christopher
    Lind, Tore
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2014, 126 (04) : 33 - 41
  • [4] Effect of esomeprazole versus famotidine on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel: A double-blind, randomized trial
    Tunggal, Prabowo
    Ng, Fook-Hong
    Lam, Kwok-Fai
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    Lau, Yuk-Kong
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 162 (05) : 870 - 874
  • [5] Intravenous hyoscine as a premedication for colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Yoong, KY
    Perkin, D
    Portal, J
    Strickland, I
    Heymann, T
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 36 (08) : 720 - 722
  • [6] DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    ENGLISH, PMB
    TITCHEN, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1992, 42 (354): : 37 - 38
  • [7] PYLOROPLASTY VERSUS GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL
    KENNEDY, T
    JOHNSTON, GW
    LOVE, AHG
    CONNELL, AM
    SPENCER, EFA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1973, 60 (12) : 949 - 953
  • [8] Treatment of patients with persistent heartburn symptoms: A double-blind, randomized trial
    Fass, R
    Sontag, SJ
    Traxler, B
    Sostek, M
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [9] Intravenous Dextrose for Children With Gastroenteritis and Dehydration: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Levy, Jason A.
    Bachur, Richard G.
    Monuteaux, Michael C.
    Waltzman, Mark
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (03) : 281 - 288
  • [10] A randomized double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for pemphigus
    Amagai, Masayuki
    Ikeda, Shigaku
    Shimizu, Hiroshi
    Iizuka, Hajime
    Hanada, Katsumi
    Aiba, Setsuya
    Kaneko, Fumio
    Izaki, Seiichi
    Tamaki, Kunihiko
    Ikezawa, Zenro
    Takigawa, Masahiro
    Seishima, Mariko
    Tanaka, Toshihiro
    Miyachi, Yoshiki
    Katayama, Ichiro
    Horiguchi, Yuji
    Miyagawa, Sachiko
    Furukawa, Fukumi
    Iwatsuki, Keiji
    Hide, Michihiro
    Tokura, Yoshiki
    Furue, Masutaka
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Ihn, Hironobu
    Fujiwara, Sakuhei
    Nishikawa, Takeji
    Ogawa, Hideoki
    Kitajima, Yasuo
    Hashimoto, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 60 (04) : 595 - 603