Gemcitabine Alone Versus Gemcitabine Plus Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

被引:614
|
作者
Loehrer, Patrick J., Sr. [1 ]
Feng, Yang [2 ]
Cardenes, Higinia [1 ]
Wagner, Lynne [3 ]
Brell, Joanna M. [4 ]
Cella, David [3 ]
Flynn, Patrick [5 ]
Ramanathan, Ramesh K. [7 ]
Crane, Christopher H. [8 ]
Alberts, Steven R. [6 ]
Benson, Al B., III [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Melvin & Bren Simon Canc Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Ireland Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Minneapolis Hematol Oncol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
PHASE-I TRIAL; RADIATION-DOSE ESCALATION; CONCURRENT RADIOTHERAPY; III TRIAL; CISPLATIN; THERAPY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; INFUSION; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8904
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the role of radiation therapy with concurrent gemcitabine (GEM) compared with GEM alone in patients with localized unresectable pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomly assigned to receive GEM alone (at 1,000 mg/m(2)/wk for weeks 1 to 6, followed by 1 week rest, then for 3 of 4 weeks) or GEM (600 mg/m2/wk for weeks 1 to 5, then 4 weeks later 1,000 mg/m(2) for 3 of 4 weeks) plus radiotherapy (starting on day 1, 1.8 Gy/Fx for total of 50.4 Gy). Measurement of quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary questionnaire was also performed. Results Of 74 patients entered on trial and randomly assigned to receive GEM alone (arm A; n = 37) or GEM plus radiation (arm B; n = 34), patients in arm B had greater incidence of grades 4 and 5 toxicities (41% v 9%), but grades 3 and 4 toxicities combined were similar (77% in A v 79% in B). No statistical differences were seen in quality of life measurements at 6, 15 to 16, and 36 weeks. The primary end point was survival, which was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.9 to 11.4 months) and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 15.5 months) for arms A and B, respectively (one-sided P = .017 by stratified log-rank test). Conclusion This trial demonstrates improved overall survival with the addition of radiation therapy to GEM in patients with localized unresectable pancreatic cancer, with acceptable toxicity. J Clin Oncol 29: 4105-4112. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:4105 / 4112
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297
    Berlin, JD
    Catalano, P
    Thomas, JP
    Kugler, JW
    Haller, DG
    Benson, AB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) : 3270 - 3275
  • [2] GEMCITABINE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER
    Otsuka, T.
    Kamachi, S.
    Akiyama, T.
    Fujimoto, M.
    Kawazoe, S.
    Ureshino, N.
    Watanabe, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 161 - 161
  • [3] Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ma, Yang-Yang
    Leng, Yin
    Xing, Yan-Li
    Li, Hong-Mei
    Chen, Ji-Bing
    Niu, Li-Zhi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2020, 8 (22) : 5564 - 5575
  • [4] Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yang-Yang Ma
    Yin Leng
    Yan-Li Xing
    Hong-Mei Li
    Ji-Bing Chen
    Li-Zhi Niu
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2020, 8 (22) : 5564 - 5575
  • [5] Induction Gemcitabine Plus Concurrent Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Resected Pancreatic Cancer
    Youl, M.
    Hashem, S.
    Brade, A.
    Cummings, B.
    Dawson, L. A.
    Gallinger, S.
    Hedley, D.
    Jiang, H.
    Kim, J.
    Krzyzanowska, M. K.
    Ringash, J.
    Wong, R.
    Brierley, J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : 203 - 209
  • [6] Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer:: A randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group
    Herrmann, Richard
    Bodoky, Gyoergy
    Ruhstaller, Thomas
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Bajetta, Emilio
    Schueller, Johannes
    Saletti, Piercarlo
    Bauer, Jean
    Figer, Arie
    Pestalozzi, Bernhard
    Koehne, Claus-Henning
    Mingrone, Walter
    Stemmer, Salomon M.
    Tamas, Karin
    Kornek, Gabriela V.
    Koeberle, Dieter
    Cina, Susanne
    Bernhard, Juerg
    Dietrich, Daniel
    Scheithauer, Werner
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (16) : 2212 - 2217
  • [7] Gemcitabine-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    de Lange, SM
    van Groeningen, CJ
    Meijer, OWM
    Cuesta, MA
    Langendijk, JA
    van Riel, JMGH
    Pinedo, HM
    Peters, GJ
    Meijer, S
    Slotman, BJ
    Giaccone, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (09) : 1212 - 1217
  • [8] Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    All, M.
    Carillio, G.
    Mazzola, A.
    Bagnato, S.
    Di Leo, M. G.
    Fallica, G.
    Anna, Aiello R.
    Chiarenza, M.
    Caruso, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : XI52 - XI52
  • [9] Randomized controlled trial of gemcitabine in combination with UFT versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
    Ohkawa, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 346S - 346S
  • [10] Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mustafa Cengiz
    Faruk Zorlu
    Suayip Yalcin
    Murat Gurkaynak
    I. Lale Atahan
    Ibrahim H. Gullu
    Medical Oncology, 2007, 24 : 239 - 243