Diversification, Biotic Interchange, and the Universal Trade-Off Hypothesis

被引:48
|
作者
Tilman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
来源
AMERICAN NATURALIST | 2011年 / 178卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
coexistence; invasion; trade-offs; speciation; biotic interchange; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; PLANT-POPULATIONS; MORTALITY-RATES; SOUTH-AMERICA; LONG-TERM; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; INVASION;
D O I
10.1086/661245
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Competition theory predicts that multispecies coexistence requires that species have traits that fall on the same interspecific trade-off surface. Fossil records for mollusks, mammals, trees, and other taxa show that with rare exception, ecologically similar species have coexisted for a million years or more after interchange between formerly isolated realms. This coexistence suggests the possibility, termed the universal trade-off hypothesis, that ecologically similar species of different realms have been bound to the same interspecific trade-off surface despite millions of years of independent evolution. Such persistence fails to support the biogeographic superiority hypothesis, which posits that genetic drift, recombination, mutation, and selection would cause taxa of one realm to gain superiority over those of another realm during long periods of isolation. Analysis of the lengths of time that species have persisted once in contact suggests that the trade-off surfaces of realms differed by <0.1% at the time of interchange. This implies that macroevolutionary patterns of differentiation and speciation within and between realms were more likely the movement of traits on a common trade-off surface rather than directional selection achieved without compensatory trade-offs and costs. The existence of transrealm trade-offs, should further work support this possibility, has deep implications for ecology and evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 371
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A trade-off in corporate diversification
    Ekkayokkaya, Manapol
    Paudyal, Krishna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2015, 34 : 275 - 292
  • [2] THE TRADE-OFF HYPOTHESIS REVISITED
    FERRAN, N
    BERLYNE, GM
    ADLER, AJ
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 27 (01) : 114 - 114
  • [3] TRADE-OFF HYPOTHESIS - CURRENT STATUS
    BRICKER, NS
    FINE, LG
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1978, : S5 - S8
  • [4] Is the 'Trade-off Hypothesis' Worth Trading For?
    Phelan, Mark
    Sarkissian, Hagop
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2009, 24 (02) : 164 - 180
  • [5] Is the 'trade-off hypothesis' worth trading for?
    Mallon, Ron
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2008, 23 (02) : 247 - 255
  • [6] TRADE-OFF ANALYSES IN MAJOR INTERCHANGE DESIGN.
    Taylor, James I.
    [J]. Highway Research Record, 1973, (432): : 52 - 60
  • [7] DIVERSIFICATION AND THE RISK-RETURN TRADE-OFF
    AMIT, R
    LIVNAT, J
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1988, 31 (01): : 154 - 156
  • [8] MULTINATIONALS DIVERSIFICATION AND THE RISK-RETURN TRADE-OFF
    KIM, WC
    HWANG, P
    BURGERS, WP
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (04) : 275 - 286
  • [9] PATHOGENESIS OF UREMIC STATE - EXPOSITION OF TRADE-OFF HYPOTHESIS
    BRICKER, NS
    RUTSTEIN, D
    DAVIDOFF, F
    DEYKIN, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1972, 286 (20): : 1093 - &
  • [10] The oxidation handicap hypothesis and the carotenoid allocation trade-off
    Alonso-Alvarez, C.
    Perez-Rodriguez, L.
    Mateo, R.
    Chastel, O.
    Vinuela, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (06) : 1789 - 1797