The Workplace Discrimination Experiences of Individuals with Cancer in the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Era

被引:7
|
作者
Leslie, Mykal [1 ,4 ]
Strauser, David R. [2 ]
McMahon, Brian [3 ]
Greco, Chelsea [2 ]
Rumrill, Phillip D., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Kent State Univ, CRC, 405G White Hall,POB 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
Cancer; Workplace discrimination; Vocational rehabilitation; DISCHARGE IMPLICATIONS; ALLEGATIONS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-019-09851-4
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the patterns in allegations of workplace discrimination filed by individuals with cancer. Objective The goal of the research was to describe discrimination, both actual and perceived, that has occurred against individuals with cancer in comparison to a group of individuals with other general disabilities (GENDIS) through analyses of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Integrated Mission System (IMS) database. Methods An ex post facto, causal comparative quantitative design was used to examine Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) Title I complaints received by the EEOC from people with cancer from 2009 through 2016 (n = 10,848) in comparison to the GENDIS group over the same time period (n = 13,338). Results Results revealed statistically significant differences in the patterns of issues alleged by the two groups. When compared to the GENDIS group, the cancer group was significantly older and had proportionally more individuals who identified as Asian than the GENDIS group. People with cancer were more likely to allege discrimination in the areas of unlawful discharge, demotion, wages, layoff, benefits, and referrals. They were less likely to allege discrimination in areas of reasonable accommodation, hiring, and suspension. Also, the cancer group was more likely than the GENDIS group to file allegations against smaller employers and employers in the Southeast region of the United States, while employers in the Mid-Atlantic and Rocky Mountain regions were less likely to be named in allegations by people with cancer. The cancer group was also significantly more likely than the GENDIS group to find that EEOC investigations of their allegations resulted in merit-based case resolution, that is, discrimination had indeed occurred. Owing to the large sample size, some of these between-group differences were small in magnitude. Conclusion The workplace discrimination experiences of people with cancer are substantially different from those of people with other disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Workplace Discrimination Experiences of Individuals with Cancer in the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Era
    Mykal Leslie
    David R. Strauser
    Brian McMahon
    Chelsea Greco
    Phillip D. Rumrill
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2020, 30 : 115 - 124
  • [2] Workplace Discrimination and Visual Impairment: Still a Concern After the Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act
    Victor, Callie
    Copolillo, Al
    Pawluk, Dianne
    Gary, Kelli Williams
    Thacker, Leroy, II
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 71 (04):
  • [3] Workplace Discrimination and Visual Impairment: A Comparison of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charges and Resolutions Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act
    Victor, Callie M.
    Thacker, Leroy R.
    Gary, Kelli W.
    Pawluk, Dianne T. V.
    Copolillo, Al
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2017, 111 (05) : 475 - 482
  • [4] Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008
    Rozalski, Michael
    Katsiyannis, Antonis
    Ryan, Joseph
    Collins, Terri
    Stewart, Angela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISABILITY POLICY STUDIES, 2010, 21 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [5] Assessing Perceived Work Discrimination From Visual Impairments After the Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act
    Victor, Callie
    Copolillo, Al
    Pawluk, Dianne
    Gary, Kelli Williams
    Thacker, Leroy, II
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 71 (04):
  • [6] The workplace discrimination experiences of people with multiple sclerosis across three phases of Americans with Disabilities Act implementation
    Roesslera, Richard T.
    Rumrill, Phillip D., Jr.
    Li, Jian
    McMahon, Brian T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 45 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [7] GENETIC DISCRIMINATION AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
    NATOWICZ, MR
    ALPER, JK
    ALPER, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1992, 51 (04) : 895 - 897
  • [8] The Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: Implications for the Forensic Psychiatrist
    Scott, Charles L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2010, 38 (01): : 95 - 99
  • [9] The employment discrimination experiences of younger and older Americans with cancer under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act
    Strauser, David R.
    Leslie, Mykal J.
    Rumrill, Phillip
    McMahon, Brian
    Greco, Chelsea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2020, 14 (05) : 614 - 623
  • [10] The employment discrimination experiences of younger and older Americans with cancer under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act
    David R. Strauser
    Mykal J. Leslie
    Phillip Rumrill
    Brian McMahon
    Chelsea Greco
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2020, 14 : 614 - 623