The Rates and Risk Factors of Intra-Pedicular Accuracy and Proximal Facet Joint Violation for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases Cortical Bone Trajectory Versus Traditional Trajectory Pedicle Screw

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Ren-Jie [1 ]
Zhou, Lu-Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Lai [1 ]
Zhang, Hua-Qing [1 ]
Ge, Peng [1 ]
Jia, Chong-Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Jian-Xiang [1 ]
Shen, Cai-Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Orthoped & Spine Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 210 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
cortical bone trajectory; degenerative lumbar diseases; pedicle screw placement accuracy; proximal facet joint; traditional trajectory; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; INTERBODY FUSION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PLACEMENT; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004083
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To compare the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and proximal facet joint violation (FJV) in single-level degenerative lumbar diseases using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and traditional trajectory (TT) techniques, and analyze their possible risk factors. Summary of Background Data. CBT screws have been utilized increasingly to improve cortical bone contact to prevent screw pullout and reduce approach-related morbidity. However, the studies on intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV between the two methods are rare. Methods. A total of 40 patients who required single-level instruments were included in the retrospective study treated with the CBT-TLIF and the TT-TLIF at a 1:1 ratio from March 2019 to August 2020. The radiographic outcomes were the intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV. Moreover, the possible risk factors were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results. As for the intra-pedicular accuracy, 73 screws (91.3%) were classified as grade A, 7 screws (8.7%) classified as grade B in the CBT group. A total of 71 screws (88.8%) were graded A with remaining 8 screws (10.0%) graded B and 1 screw (1.2%) graded C in the TT group. The proportion of optimal and clinically acceptable screw positions in the two groups were not significantly different (P> 0.05). In addition, the rate of proximal FJV in CBT approach (8.3%) was significantly lower than that in the TT approach (35.0%) (P< 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed the TT insertion approach and facet angle >= 45 degrees were the independent risk factors for proximal FJV, but no factors above affected intra-pedicular accuracy. Conclusion. Compared with the TT approach in TLIF, the CBT approach showed similar intra-pedicular accuracy and remarkable superiority in proximal facet joint protection. Facet angle >= 45 degrees is the independent risk factors for proximal FJV.
引用
收藏
页码:E1274 / E1282
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique
    Matsukawa, Keitaro
    Kato, Takashi
    Yato, Yoshiyuki
    Sasao, Hiroshi
    Imabayashi, Hideaki
    Hosogane, Naobumi
    Asazuma, Takashi
    Chiba, Kazuhiro
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (14) : E851 - E856
  • [2] Comparison of facet fusion rates and clinical outcomes between cortical bone trajectory screw and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Miyashita, Tomohiro
    Kato, Kei
    Yunde, Atsushi
    Ataka, Hiromi
    Tanno, Takaaki
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (07): : 1202 - 1210
  • [3] A Comparison Between Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws And Traditional Pedicle Screws in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Five-Year Results
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Park, Yung
    Lee, Byung Ho
    Park, Si Young
    Lim, Chae Kwang
    Yang, Jae Ho
    Ha, Joong-Won
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (22) : 1617 - 1625
  • [4] Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion
    Hua-Qing Zhang
    Can-Can Wang
    Ren-Jie Zhang
    Lu-Ping Zhou
    Chong-Yu Jia
    Peng Ge
    Cai-Liang Shen
    BMC Surgery, 22
  • [5] Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion
    Zhang, Hua-Qing
    Wang, Can-Can
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Zhou, Lu-Ping
    Jia, Chong-Yu
    Ge, Peng
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Kuroda, Yusuke
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [7] Cortical bone trajectory instrumentation provides favorable perioperative outcomes compared to pedicle screws for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Menon, Nandakumar
    Turcotte, Justin
    Speciale, Alessandro
    Patton, Chad M.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 22 : 146 - 150
  • [8] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Kuroda, Yusuke
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (05) : 591 - 595
  • [9] Comparative Study of Cortical Bone Trajectory-Pedicle Screw (Cortical Screw) Versus Conventional Pedicle Screw in Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 2-Year Post Hoc Analysis from Prospectively Randomized Data
    Lee, Gun Woo
    Ahn, Myun-Whan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : E194 - E202
  • [10] Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
    Lin, Jui-Feng
    Tsai, Cheng-Chia
    Huang, Yu-Chuen
    Yang, Chih-Chuan
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2023, 17 (02) : 130 - 134