Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Bauer, Alexander [1 ]
Riemann, Juergen F. [3 ]
Seufferlein, Thomas [4 ]
Reinshagen, Max [5 ]
Hollerbach, Stephan [2 ,6 ]
Haug, Ulrike [7 ,8 ]
Unverzagt, Susanne [9 ]
Boese, Stephanie
Ritter-Herschbach, Madeleine [10 ]
Jahn, Patrick [10 ]
Frese, Thomas [1 ]
Harris, Michael [11 ]
Landenberger, Margarete [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Fac Med, Inst Gen Med, Halle, Germany
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Fac Med, Inst Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[3] Ludwigshafen Hosp, Dept Med C, LebensBlicke Fdn, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Ulm Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Ulm, Germany
[5] Braunschweig Municipal Hosp, Dept Med 1, Braunschweig, Germany
[6] Celle Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Celle, Germany
[7] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Bremen, Germany
[8] Univ Bremen, Fac Human & Hlth Sci, Bremen, Germany
[9] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Epidemiol Biometr & Informat Sci, Fac Med, Halle, Germany
[10] Halle Univ Hosp, Nursing Res Unit, Halle, Germany
[11] Univ Bath, Dept Hlth, Bath, Avon, England
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2018年 / 115卷 / 43期
关键词
1ST-DEGREE RELATIVES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PARTICIPATION; HISTORY; INTERVENTION; COMMUNICATION; BARRIER; INDIVIDUALS; EFFICACY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2018.0715
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Screening colonoscopy can lower the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), yet participation rates are low even in groups at high risk. The goal of this study was to double the rate of participation in screening colonoscopy among persons at familial risk and then to determine the frequency of neoplasia in this risk group. Methods: In a nationwide, cluster-randomized. multicenter study. first-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with CRC across Germany received written informational materials concerning the familial risk of CRC. along with an invitation to undergo colonoscopy. Participants in the intervention group were additionally counseled by nurses over the telephone. The primary endpoint of the study was colonoscopy uptake within 30 days. Results: The participants' mean age was 50.8 years. The colonoscopy uptake rates were 99/125 (79%) in the intervention group and 97/136 (71%) in the control group (RR = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [0.97; 1.28]). A polypectomy was performed in 72 of 196 asymptomatic persons (37%). In 13 cases (7%), an advanced neoplasia was detected: two of these persons had colon cancer (stages TO and T1). 42% of the participants expressed barriers against colonoscopy. 22 reported mild side effects: there were no serious side effects. Conclusion: Additional counseling by nurses over the telephone does not increase the participation rate. Approaching patients who have CRC is an opportunity to increase the participation of their first-degree relatives in screening colonoscopy. The frequency of neoplasia that was found in this study underscores the need to screen relatives even before they reach the usual age threshold for screening.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Colorectal cancer screening in the familial risk population: Is colonoscopy still the strategy of choice?
    Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio Z.
    Hernandez-Alvarez-de-Buylla, Noemi
    Nicolas-Perez, David
    Carrillo, Marta
    Hernandez, Goretti
    Quintero, Enrique
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA, 2016, 39 (05): : 352 - 360
  • [2] Colonoscopy screening of patients at high familial risk for colorectal cancer (CRC)
    Breite, I
    Markowitz, A
    Zauber, A
    Weintraub, R
    Winawer, S
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A495 - A495
  • [3] Results of screening colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer
    Phull, PS
    Gregory, H
    Miedzybrodska, Z
    [J]. GUT, 2005, 54 : A74 - A74
  • [4] Screening colonoscopy intervals in familial colorectal cancer
    Kalady, Matthew F.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 1
  • [5] Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: High participation rates are not affected by source of invitation
    Corbett, M
    Chambers, S
    Shadbolt, B
    Taupin, D
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A420 - A420
  • [6] Screening interval recommendations following a normal colonoscopy in individuals with a familial risk of colorectal cancer
    Plath, Jasper
    Siebenhofer, Andrea
    Guethlin, Corina
    Blumenstein, Irina
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (04): : 361 - 364
  • [7] Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer
    Bradshaw, N
    Holloway, S
    Penman, I
    Dunlop, MG
    Porteous, MEM
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (12) : 1748 - 1751
  • [8] The Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Risk
    Manekeller, Steffen
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2023, 148 (01): : 10 - 10
  • [9] Colonoscopy outcomes in colorectal cancer screening population in Qatar
    John, Anil
    Varughese, Betsy
    Pillai, Viswapriya
    Singh, Rajvir
    Al Kaabi, Saad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 : 610 - 610
  • [10] Colonoscopy or barium enema for population colorectal cancer screening?
    Mitchell, RMS
    Byrne, MF
    Baillie, J
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2003, 35 (04) : 207 - 211