Comparing single- and dual-process models of memory development

被引:10
|
作者
Hayes, Brett K. [1 ]
Dunn, John C. [2 ]
Joubert, Amy [1 ]
Taylor, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; STATE-TRACE ANALYSIS; PROCESS-DISSOCIATION; RECOGNITION MEMORY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FAMILIARITY; RECOLLECTION; CHILDREN; CHILDHOOD; AGE;
D O I
10.1111/desc.12469
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This experiment examined single-process and dual-process accounts of the development of visual recognition memory. The participants, 6-7-year-olds, 9-10-year-olds and adults, were presented with a list of pictures which they encoded under shallow or deep conditions. They then made recognition and confidence judgments about a list containing old and new items. We replicated the main trends reported by Ghetti and Angelini () in that recognition hit rates increased from 6 to 9years of age, with larger age changes following deep than shallow encoding. Formal versions of the dual-process high threshold signal detection model and several single-process models (equal variance signal detection, unequal variance signal detection, mixture signal detection) were fit to the developmental data. The unequal variance and mixture signal detection models gave a better account of the data than either of the other models. A state-trace analysis found evidence for only one underlying memory process across the age range tested. These results suggest that single-process memory models based on memory strength are a viable alternative to dual-process models for explaining memory development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hierarchical single- and dual-process models of recognition memory
    Pratte, Michael S.
    Rouder, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 55 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [2] Single- and Dual-Process Models of Biased Contingency Detection
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    Blanco, Fernando
    Yarritu, Ion
    Matute, Helena
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 63 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [3] Response time models separate single- and dual-process accounts of memory-based decisions
    Peter M. Kraemer
    Laura Fontanesi
    Mikhail S. Spektor
    Sebastian Gluth
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2021, 28 : 304 - 323
  • [4] Response time models separate single- and dual-process accounts of memory-based decisions
    Kraemer, Peter M.
    Fontanesi, Laura
    Spektor, Mikhail S.
    Gluth, Sebastian
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2021, 28 (01) : 304 - 323
  • [5] Reframing Single- and Dual-Process Theories as Cognitive Models: Commentary on De Neys (2021)
    Dewey, Aliya R.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (06) : 1428 - 1431
  • [6] Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory
    Dewey, Aliya R.
    [J]. THINKING & REASONING, 2023, 29 (02) : 177 - 212
  • [7] Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory
    Higham, PA
    Vokey, JR
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (04): : 714 - 744
  • [8] A Dual-Process Perspective on Mindfulness, Memory, and Consciousness
    Rosenstreich, Eyal
    Ruderman, Lital
    [J]. MINDFULNESS, 2017, 8 (02) : 505 - 516
  • [9] A Dual-Process Perspective on Mindfulness, Memory, and Consciousness
    Eyal Rosenstreich
    Lital Ruderman
    [J]. Mindfulness, 2017, 8 : 505 - 516
  • [10] Nonword Reading: Comparing Dual-Route Cascaded and Connectionist Dual-Process Models With Human Data
    Pritchard, Stephen C.
    Coltheart, Max
    Palethorpe, Sallyanne
    Castles, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2012, 38 (05) : 1268 - 1288