Recovery of in-situ methanotrophic activity following acetylene inhibition

被引:9
|
作者
Urmann, Karina [1 ]
Schroth, Martin H. [1 ]
Zeyer, Josef [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
acetylene; gas push-pull test; inhibitor; methanotrophs; methane oxidation; recovery;
D O I
10.1007/s10533-008-9223-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide (CO2). To understand CH4 cycling, quantitative information about microbial CH4 oxidation in soils is essential. Field methods such as the gas push-pull test (GPPT) to quantify CH4 oxidation are often used in combination with specific inhibitors, such as acetylene (C2H2). Acetylene irreversibly binds to the enzyme methane monooxygenase, but little is known about recovery of CH4 oxidation activity after C2H2 inhibition in situ, which is important when performing several experiments at the same location. To assess recovery of CH4 oxidation activity following C2H2 inhibition, we performed a series of GPPTs over 8 weeks at two different locations in the vadose zone above a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer in Studen, Switzerland. After 4 weeks a maximum recovery of 30% and 50% of the respective initial activity was reached, with a subsequent slight drop in activity at both locations. Likely, CH4 oxidation activity and CH4 concentrations were too low to allow for rapid recovery following C2H2 inhibition at the studied locations. Therefore, alternative competitive inhibitors have to be evaluated for application in conjunction with GPPTs, especially for sites with low activity.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 355
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recovery of in-situ methanotrophic activity following acetylene inhibition
    Karina Urmann
    Martin H. Schroth
    Josef Zeyer
    [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 89 : 347 - 355
  • [2] Physiological limitations of methanotrophic activity in situ
    King, GM
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY OF ATMOSPHERIC TRACE GASES: SOURCES, SINKS AND GLOBAL CHANGE PROCESSES, 1996, 39 : 17 - 32
  • [3] Groundwater restoration following in-situ recovery (ISR) mining of uranium
    Ruiz, Omar
    Thomson, Bruce
    Cerrato, Jose M.
    Rodriguez-Freire, Lucia
    [J]. APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 109
  • [4] Salt inhibition of methanotrophic activity in sphagnum peat
    Kolesnikov, OM
    Panikov, NS
    [J]. EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 38 (04) : 419 - 424
  • [5] Monitoring recovery of a crude oilcontaminated saltmarsh following in-situ remediation treatments
    Lee, K
    Venosa, AD
    Suidan, MT
    Greer, CW
    Wohlgeschaffen, G
    Cobanli, C
    Tremblay, GH
    Gauthier, J
    Doe, KG
    [J]. COASTAL ENVIRONMENT: ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IN COASTAL REGIONS IV, 2002, 8 : 127 - 137
  • [6] MEASUREMENT OF NITROGENASE ACTIVITY OF INTACT LEGUME SYMBIONTS IN-SITU USING ACETYLENE REDUCTION ASSAY
    FISHBECK, K
    EVANS, HJ
    BOERSMA, LL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1973, 65 (03) : 429 - 432
  • [7] Geochemistry of In-Situ Recovery of Metals
    Nicolai, Jana
    Maerten, Horst
    Krause, Julia
    Kalka, Harald
    Zauner, Micha Janosch
    [J]. MINING MEETS WATER - CONFLICTS AND SOLUTIONS, 2016, : 1355 - 1355
  • [8] Debottlenecking product inhibition in 1,3-propanediol fermentation by In-Situ Product Recovery
    Kaur, Guneet
    Srivastava, A. K.
    Chand, Subhash
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 197 : 451 - 457
  • [9] Hydrological Characterization and Optimization of In-Situ Recovery
    Krause, Julia
    Nicolai, Jana
    Maerten, Horst
    [J]. MINING MEETS WATER - CONFLICTS AND SOLUTIONS, 2016, : 1347 - 1354
  • [10] IN-SITU COMBUSTION FOR OIL-RECOVERY
    MILLINGTON, A
    PRICE, D
    HUGHES, R
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1994, (16) : 632 - 635