Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products

被引:121
|
作者
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [1 ]
Hellweg, Stefanie [2 ]
Frischknecht, Rolf [3 ]
Hungerbuehler, Konrad [4 ]
Hendriks, A. Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Sci, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] ETH, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Empa, Ecoinvent Ctr, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[4] ETH, Inst Chem & Bioengn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
ecological footprint; life cycle assessment; ecoinvent; ecoindicator;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.017
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We present and discuss ecological footprint (EF) calculations for a large number of products and services consumed in the western economy. Product-specific EFs were calculated from consistent and quality-controlled life cycle information of 2630 products and services, including energy, materials, transport, waste treatment and infrastructural processes. We formed 19 homogeneous product/process subgroups for further analysis, containing in total 1549 processes. Per group, the average contribution of two types of land occupation (direct and energy related) to the total EF was derived. It was found that the ecological footprint of the majority of products is dominated by the consumption of non-renewable energy. Notable exceptions are the EFs of biomass energy, hydro energy, paper and cardboard, and agricultural products with a relatively high contribution of direct land occupation. We also compared the ecological footprint results with the results of a commonly used life cycle impact assessment method, the Ecoindicator 99 (EI). It was found that the majority of the products have an EF/EI ratio of around 30 m(2)-eq. yr/ ecopoint +/- a factor of 5. The typical ratio reduces to 25 m(2) yr/ecopoints by excluding the arbitrary EF for nuclear energy demand. The relatively small variation of this ratio implies that the use of land and use of fossil fuels are important drivers of overall environmental impact. Ecological footprints may therefore serve as a screening indicator for environmental performance. However, our results also show that the usefulness of EF as a stand-alone indicator for environmental impact is limited for product life cycles with relative high mineral consumption and process-specific metal and dust emissions. For these products the EF/EI ratio can substantially deviate from the average value. Finally, we suggest that the ecological footprint product data provided in this paper can be used to improve the footprint estimates of production, import and export of products on a national scale and footprint estimates of various lifestyles. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 807
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Ecological Footprint Assessment of an Academic Building
    Husain D.
    Prakash R.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2019, 100 (01) : 97 - 110
  • [2] Ecological Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities
    Castellani, Valentina
    Sala, Serenella
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 : 135 - 147
  • [3] The Ecological Footprint Accounting of Products: When Larger Is Not Worse
    Patrizi, Nicoletta
    Niccolucci, Valentina
    Pulselli, Riccardo M.
    Neri, Elena
    Bastianoni, Simone
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [4] Carbon footprint accounting for cigar production processes: A life cycle assessment perspective
    Cao, Guanzhun
    Guo, Xiaoyao
    Feng, Chuan
    Li, Tong
    Cui, Feng
    Xu, Yuan
    Yang, Shuo
    Wang, Qingsong
    Chen, Leping
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Chen, Guifang
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 21 (04) : 231 - 238
  • [5] Carbon footprint accounting for cigar production processes:A life cycle assessment perspective
    Guanzhun Cao
    Xiaoyao Guo
    Chuan Feng
    Tong Li
    Feng Cui
    Yuan Xu
    Shuo Yang
    Qingsong Wang
    Leping Chen
    Xueliang Yuan
    Guifang Chen
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2023, (04) : 231 - 238
  • [6] Reply to Pfister and Hellweg: Water footprint accounting, impact assessment, and life-cycle assessment
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    Gerbens-Leenes, Winnie
    van der Meer, Theo H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (40) : E114 - E114
  • [7] Exploring ecosystem services assessment through Ecological Footprint accounting
    Mancini, Maria Serena
    Galli, Alessandro
    Coscieme, Luca
    Niccolucci, Valentina
    Lin, David
    Pulselli, Federico Maria
    Bastianoni, Simone
    Marchettini, Nadia
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 228 - 235
  • [8] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    Mengyang He
    Yang Wang
    Haotian Ma
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [9] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    He, Mengyang
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Haotian
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [10] Life Cycle Ecological Footprint Reduction for a Tropical Building
    Husain, Dilawar
    Prakash, Ravi
    Ahmad, Akbar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022