Evaluation of Renal Masses With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Initial Experience

被引:76
|
作者
Gerst, Scott [1 ]
Hann, Lucy E. [1 ]
Li, Duan [1 ]
Gonen, Mithat [2 ]
Tickoo, Satish [3 ]
Sohn, Michael J. [1 ]
Russo, Paul [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast & Imaging Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
clear cell carcinoma; IV contrast medium; kidney; microbubbles; ultrasound; CELL CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS; HELICAL CT; TUMORS; US; DIFFERENTIATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.6330
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Nearly 25% of solid renal tumors are indolent cancer or benign and can be managed conservatively in selected patients. This prospective study was performed to determine whether preoperative IV microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used to differentiate indolent and benign renal tumors from more aggressive clear cell carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-four patients with renal tumors underwent preoperative gray-scale, color, power Doppler, and octafluoropropane microbubble IV contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Three blinded radiologists reading in consensus compared rate of contrast wash-in, grade and pattern of enhancement, and contrast washout compared with adjacent parenchyma. Contrast ultrasound findings were compared with surgical histopathologic findings for all patients. RESULTS. The 34 patients had 23 clear cell carcinomas, three type 1 papillary carcinomas, one chromophobe carcinoma, one clear rare multilocular low-grade malignant tumor, two unclassified lesions, three oncocytomas, and one benign angiomyolipoma. The combination of heterogeneous lesion echotexture and delayed lesion washout had 85% positive predictive value, 43% negative predictive value, 48% sensitivity, and 82% specificity for predicting whether a lesion was conventional clear cell carcinoma or another tumor. Diminished lesion enhancement grade had 75% positive predictive value, 81% negative predictive value, 55% sensitivity, and 91% specificity for non-clear cell histologic features, either benign or low-grade malignant. Combining delayed washout with quantitative lesion peak intensity of at least 20% of kidney peak intensity had 91% positive predictive value, 40% negative predictive value, 63% sensitivity, and 80% specificity in the prediction of clear cell histologic features. CONCLUSION. Ultrasound features of gray-scale heterogeneity, lesion washout, grade of contrast enhancement, and quantitative measure of peak intensity may be useful for differentiating clear cell carcinoma and non-clear cell renal tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 906
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Evaluation of Renal Masses With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Initial Experience Editorial Comment
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : 1220 - 1220
  • [2] Evaluation of Renal Masses with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    Houtzager, S.
    Wijkstra, H.
    de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
    Laguna, M. P.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [3] Evaluation of Renal Masses with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    S. Houtzager
    H. Wijkstra
    J. J. M. C. H. de la Rosette
    M. P. Laguna
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2013, 14 : 116 - 123
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound of Renal Masses
    Bennett, Jack
    Peterson, Cynthia
    Barr, Richard G.
    [J]. APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (06) : 10 - 16
  • [5] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES
    Oh, Tae Hoon
    Ahn, Seong Hoon
    Kwon, Whi An
    Lee, Jea Whan
    Han, Dong Youp
    Park, Seung Chul
    Jeong, Hee Jong
    Seo, Ill Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E109 - E110
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing renal masses
    Bertolotto, Michele
    Bucci, Stefano
    Valentino, Massimo
    Curro, Francesca
    Sachs, Camilla
    Cova, Maria Assunta
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 105 : 41 - 48
  • [7] Evaluation of Renal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Sonovue and Sonazoid
    Zhang, Haixiang
    Guo, Gang
    Zhu, Run
    Wang, Hua
    Chen, Peng
    Qin, Chi
    Gao, Yongyan
    [J]. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2025, 51 (01): : 128 - 137
  • [8] Clinical Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses With Bosniak Classification by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Computer Tomography
    Lan, Li
    Yang, Yu
    Xu, Zi-Qiang
    Jin, Xuan-Chen
    Huang, Ka-Te
    Chen, Yu-Xuan
    Yang, Chen-Xing
    Zhou, Man
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (12) : 2845 - 2858
  • [9] RENAL MASSES: EVALUATION WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE PSEUDOCAPSULE SIGN
    Dai, Wen-Bin
    Yu, Bo
    Diao, Xue-Hong
    Cao, Hongli
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yue
    Zhan, Jia
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (08): : 1924 - 1932
  • [10] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Solid Renal Masses
    Geyer, Thomas
    Schwarze, Vincent
    Marschner, Constantin
    Schnitzer, Moritz L.
    Froelich, Matthias F.
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (11): : 1 - 8