Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units

被引:8
|
作者
Velten, Christian [1 ]
Boyd, Robert [1 ]
Jeong, Kyoungkeun [1 ]
Garg, Madhur K. [1 ,2 ]
Tome, Wolfgang A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
来源
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; image quality; MVCT; tomotherapy; IMAGE REGISTRATION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12859
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image quality metrics were evaluated on an Accuray Radixact unit to recommend scan settings for the implementation of a consistent adaptive radiotherapy program. Megavoltage computed tomography image quality was evaluated and compared to a kilovoltage CT (kVCT) simulator using a commercial cone beam computed tomography image quality phantom. Megavoltage computed tomographies were acquired on the Accuray Radixact using fine, normal, and coarse pitches, with all available reconstruction slice thicknesses, each of which were reconstructed using standard and iterative reconstruction (IR). Image quality metrics (IQM) were evaluated using DoseLab: automatically and manually calculated spatial resolution, subject contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Scanning time was 15.6 s/cm for fine, 8.1 s/cm for normal, and 5.6 s/cm for coarse pitch. Automatically evaluated spatial resolutions ranged from 0.39, 0.41, to 0.42 lp/mm for standard reconstruction and from 0.24, 0.21, to 0.18 lp/mm for soft-tissue IR, respectively, with general IR yielding values in between these. Spatial resolution for kVCT was measured to be at least 0.42 lp/mm. Contrast was consistent across MVCT settings with 8.1 +/- 0.2%, while kVCT contrast was 10.27 +/- 0.05%. CNR was calculated to be 3.3 +/- 0.4 for standard reconstruction, 7.4 +/- 0.4 for general IR, and 12.0 +/- 1.9 for soft-tissue IR. It was found that increasing reconstruction slice thickness for a given pitch does not improve IQMs. Based on the consistency of contrast metrics across pitch values and the only slightly reduced spatial resolution using normal compared to fine pitch, we recommend the use of normal pitch with 2 mm slice thickness to maximize image quality for ART while limiting scanning time. Only for sites for which improved CNR is required and reduced spatial resolution is acceptable, soft-tissue IR is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recommendations of Megavoltage Computed Tomography Settings for the Implementation of Adaptive Radiotherapy on Helical Tomotherapy Units
    Velten, C.
    Boyd, R.
    Jeong, K.
    Kalnicki, S.
    Garg, M. K.
    Tome, W. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E789 - E789
  • [2] Daily megavoltage CT registration on adaptive radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy
    Gutierrez, A. N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Su, F.
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Stathakis, S.
    Komisopoulos, G.
    Shi, C.
    Swanson, G.
    Ha, C.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S581 - S582
  • [3] Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit
    Meeks, SL
    Harmon, JF
    Langen, KM
    Willoughby, TR
    Wagner, TH
    Kupelian, PA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (08) : 2673 - 2681
  • [4] Radiobiological and Dosimetric Analysis of Daily Megavoltage CT Registration on Adaptive Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy
    Mavroidis, P.
    Su, F-C.
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Stathakis, S.
    Komisopoulos, G.
    Shi, C.
    Swanson, G.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2011, 10 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Impact of Jaw Width On the Megavoltage Computed Tomography Image Quality and Imaging Dose with Helical Tomotherapy
    Chao, M.
    Corry, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3619 - 3619
  • [6] The utility of megavoltage computed tomography images from a helical tomotherapy system for setup verification purposes
    Forrest, LJ
    Mackie, TR
    Ruchala, K
    Turek, M
    Kapatoes, J
    Jaradat, H
    Hui, S
    Balog, J
    Vail, DM
    Mehta, MP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1639 - 1644
  • [7] Performance evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms for a megavoltage computed tomography system on a helical tomotherapy unit
    Tegtmeier, Riley C.
    Ferris, William S.
    Bayouth, John E.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2022, 8 (04)
  • [8] INVESTIGATING THE EXPECTED CLINICAL IMPACT OF DAILY MEGAVOLTAGE CT REGISTRATION ON ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY WITH HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY
    Mavroidis, P.
    Su, F. C.
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Stathakis, S.
    Komisopoulos, G.
    Shi, C.
    Swanson, G.
    Ha, C.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S373 - S373
  • [9] Investigation of the dosimetric effect of daily megavoltage CT registration techniques on adaptive radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Stathakis, S.
    Shi, C.
    Swanson, G.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S173 - S174
  • [10] Fast Megavoltage Computed Tomography: A Rapid Imaging Method for Total Body or Marrow Irradiation in Helical Tomotherapy
    Magome, Taiki
    Haga, Akihiro
    Takahashi, Yutaka
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    Dusenbery, Kathryn E.
    Hui, Susanta K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (03): : 688 - 695