Perinatal care regionalization and acceptability by professionals in France

Background: For twenty years, most of industrial countries developed recommendations on regio-nalization of perinatal care. Perinatal regionalization is particularly aimed at improving morbidity and mortality outcomes of low birth weight newborns by transferring pregnant women to the maternity units having a medical or neonatal environment suited to the risks incurred by mothers or babies. Perinatal regionalization cannot be effective without being well accepted by the majority of professionals. The objectives of this study were then to identify professionals expectations and objections to perinatal regionalisation and to compare them from a professional group to another one. Methods: Professionals of 3 French perinatal networks were under consideration: the Rhone, the Auvergne and the Gard-Lozere networks. The study included two stages: 1) a psychosociological qualitative study, based on professionals interviews, aimed at identifying main concerns of professionals and developing a questionnaire; then 2) an epidemiological quantitative study, using this questionnaire within French networks. In the questionnaire, 8 dimensions explored the professionals views: constraints related to regulation aspects and to the setting up of maternity units care levels, risk of loss of professionals competence and prestige, consequences on medical practices, on inter-professional relationship, on work organization and financial aspects, and related to the new role of 'private practice' professionals, legal consequences. Results: The response rate of the epidemiological study was 80%. The results permitted to construct 8 dimension scores describing the reasons of poor acceptability of regionalization. After taking into account the age, the sex, the network and the juridical status of the institution, the study revealed a significant poorer acceptability of regionalization by most of medical specialty groups (anesthetists, obstetricians, midwives and "private practice" professionals) compared with neonatologists, or by "private" professionals (professionals working in private clinics and "private practice" professionals) compared with professionals working in university or community hospitals. The study described also network setting up conditions related to its functioning. Conclusion: By identifying clearly professionals'objections and expectations, this study should facilitate improvement in the organization of studied perinatal networks.