A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet

被引:69
|
作者
Rastogi, Amit [1 ]
Wani, Sachin [1 ]
Gupta, Neil [1 ]
Singh, Vikas [1 ]
Gaddam, Srinivas [1 ]
Reddymasu, Savio [1 ]
Ulusarac, Ozlem [1 ]
Fan, Fang [1 ]
Romanas, Maria [1 ]
Dennis, Katie L.
Sharma, Prateek [1 ]
Bansal, Ajay [1 ]
Oropeza-Vail, Melissa [1 ]
Olyaee, Mojtaba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Kansas City, MO 64128 USA
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most endosonographers use an EUS needle with an internal stylet during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA). Reinserting the stylet into the needle after every pass is tedious and time-consuming, and there are no data to suggest that it improves the quality of the cytology specimen. Objective: To compare the samples obtained by EUS-FNA with and without a stylet for (1) the degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, and amount of blood and (2) the diagnostic yield of malignancy. Design: Prospective,single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Two tertiary care referral centers. Patients: Patients referred for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Intervention: Patients underwent EUS-FNA of the solid lesions, and 2 passes each were made with a stylet and without a stylet in the needle. The order of the passes was randomized, and the cytopathologists reviewing the slides were blinded to the stylet status of passes. Main Outcome Measurements: Degree of cellularity, adequacy, contamination, amount of blood, and the diagnostic yield of malignancy in the specimens. Results: A total of 101 patients with 118 lesions were included in final analysis; 236 FNA passes were made, each with and without a stylet. No significant differences were seen in the cellularity (P = .98), adequacy of the specimen (P = .26), contamination (P = .92), or significant amount of blood (P = .61) between specimens obtained with and without a stylet. The diagnostic yield of malignancy was 55 of 236 specimens (23%) in the with-stylet group compared with 66 of 236 specimens (28%) in the without-stylet group (P = .29). Limitations: Endosonographers were not blinded to the stylet status of the passes. Conclusions: Using a stylet during EUS-FNA does not confer any significant advantage with regard to the quality of the specimen obtained or the diagnostic yield of malignancy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT 01213290). (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:58-64.)
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 64
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Wani, Sachin
    Early, Dayna
    Kunkel, Julie
    Leathersich, Ann
    Hovis, Christine E.
    Hollander, Thomas G.
    Kohlmeier, Cara
    Zelenka, Cynthia
    Azar, Riad
    Edmundowicz, Steven
    Collins, Brian
    Liu, Jingxia
    Hall, Matthew
    Mullady, Daniel
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (02) : 328 - 335
  • [2] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-FNA with and without a stylet: No stylet is better
    Paquin, Sarto C.
    Gariepy, Gilles
    Sahai, Anand V.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB198 - AB198
  • [3] A Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) - Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) With and Without a Stylet
    Rastogi, Amit
    Wani, Sachin B.
    Gupta, Neil
    Singh, Vikas
    Gaddam, Srinivas
    Reddymasu, Savio
    Ulusarac, Ozlem
    Fan, Fang
    Romanas, Maria M.
    Dennis, Katie L.
    Sharma, Prateek
    Bansal, Ajay
    Oropeza-Vail, Melissa M.
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S661 - S661
  • [4] A Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) - Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) With and Without a Stylet
    Rastogi, Amit
    Wani, Sachin
    Gupta, Neil
    Singh, Vikas
    Gaddam, Srinivas
    Reddymasu, Savio
    Ulusarac, Ozlem
    Fan, Fang
    Romanas, Maria
    Dennis, Katie
    Sharma, Prateek
    Bansal, Ajay
    Oropeza-Vail, Melissa
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S528 - S528
  • [5] Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing a new EUS-guided core biopsy needle against the EUS-guided FNA needle
    Wee, E.
    Lakhtakia, S.
    Gupta, R.
    Sekaran, A.
    Arjunan, S.
    Monga, A.
    Shah, N.
    Kalapala, R.
    Reddy, D. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 190 - 190
  • [6] A prospective randomized trial of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using a 25-gauge core biopsy needle with and without a stylet
    Yang, Min Jae
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Lee, Dakeun
    Lim, Hyunee
    Kim, Young Bae
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (09): : 3777 - 3782
  • [7] A prospective randomized trial of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using a 25-gauge core biopsy needle with and without a stylet
    Min Jae Yang
    Jae Chul Hwang
    Byung Moo Yoo
    Jin Hong Kim
    Dakeun Lee
    Hyunee Lim
    Young Bae Kim
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 3777 - 3782
  • [8] A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses
    Chen, Qian
    Cheng, Bin
    Jiang, Tianan
    Dou, Lizhou
    Wang, Jinglin
    Li, Yawen
    Zhang, Yueming
    Sun, Bo
    Shan, Hongbo
    Deng, Zhuang
    Xu, Guoliang
    Yang, Xiujiang
    Wang, Guiqi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S431 - S431
  • [9] Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue
    Ginès, A
    Wiersema, MJ
    Clain, JE
    Pochron, NL
    Rajan, E
    Levy, MJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (04) : 597 - 601
  • [10] Cumulative Gain of Successive EUS-FNA Passes and Predictors for Diagnosis of Malignancy in EUS-Guided FNA of Pancreatic Masses: Results From a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wani, Sachin
    Mullady, Daniel
    Early, Dayna S.
    Rastogi, Amit
    Collins, Brian T.
    Wang, Jeff F.
    Marshall, Carrie
    Sams, Sharon B.
    Yen, Roy D.
    Rizeq, Mona
    Romanas, Maria M.
    Ulusarac, Ozlem
    Brauer, Brian C.
    Gaddam, Srinivas
    Hollander, Thomas G.
    Hosford, Lindsay
    Johnson, Sydney S.
    Kushnir, Vladimir M.
    Amateau, Stuart K.
    Kohlmeier, Cara
    Azar, Riad R.
    Das, Ananya
    Fukami, Norio
    Shah, Raj J.
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S574 - S575