Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data

被引:59
|
作者
Dixit, Avyuk [1 ]
Yohannan, Jithin [2 ]
Boland, Michael V. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Dept Ophthalmol, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Clinical data; Glaucoma; Machine learning; Progression; RNN; Visual field; PREDICTION; CRITERIA; TRIALS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.020
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Rule-based approaches to determining glaucoma progression from visual fields (VFs) alone are discordant and have tradeoffs. To detect better when glaucoma progression is occurring, we used a longitudinal data set of merged VF and clinical data to assess the performance of a convolutional long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network. Design: Retrospective analysis of longitudinal clinical and VF data. Participants: From 2 initial datasets of 672 123 VF results from 213 254 eyes and 350 437 samples of clinical data, persons at the intersection of both datasets with 4 or more VF results and corresponding baseline clinical data (cup-to-disc ratio, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure) were included. After exclusion criteria-specifically the removal of VFs with high false-positive and false-negative rates and entries with missing data-were applied to ensure reliable data, 11 242 eyes remained. Methods: Three commonly used glaucoma progression algorithms (VF index slope, mean deviation slope, and pointwise linear regression) were used to define eyes as stable or progressing. Two machine learning models, one exclusively trained on VF data and another trained on both VF and clinical data, were tested. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) calculated on a held-out test set and mean accuracies from threefold cross-validation were used to compare the performance of the machine learning models. Results: The convolutional LSTM network demonstrated 91% to 93% accuracy with respect to the different conventional glaucoma progression algorithms given 4 consecutive VF results for each participant. The model that was trained on both VF and clinical data (AUC, 0.89-0.93) showed better diagnostic ability than a model exclusively trained on VF results (AUC, 0.79-0.82; P < 0.001). Conclusions: A convolutional LSTM architecture can capture local and global trends in VFs over time. It is well suited to assessing glaucoma progression because of its ability to extract spatiotemporal features that other algorithms cannot. Supplementing VF results with clinical data improves the model's ability to assess glaucoma progression and better reflects the way clinicians manage data when managing glaucoma. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1026
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data
    Dixit, Avyuk
    Boland, Michael V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [2] Detection of Longitudinal Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Using Machine Learning
    Yousefi, Siamak
    Kiwaki, Taichi
    Zheng, Yuhui
    Sugiura, Hiroki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Lemij, Hans
    Yamanishi, Kenji
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 193 : 71 - 79
  • [3] Glaucoma subtyping based on visual field progression using unsupervised machine learning
    Huang, Xiaoqin
    Poursoroush, Asma
    Sun, Jian
    Pasquale, Louis R.
    Boland, Michael
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Yousefi, Siamak
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [4] The Usefulness of Assessing Glaucoma Progression With Postprocessed Visual Field Data
    Abu, Sampson L.
    Poleon, Shervonne
    Racette, Lyne
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 11 (05):
  • [5] Spatial Modeling of Visual Field Data for Assessing Glaucoma Progression
    Betz-Stablein, Brigid D.
    Morgan, William H.
    House, Philip H.
    Hazelton, Martin L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (02) : 1544 - 1553
  • [6] Assessing glaucoma progression with post-processed visual field data
    Listowell, Abu Sampson
    Poleon, Shervonne
    Racette, Lyne
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [7] Deep Learning Prediction of Glaucoma Progression using Multimodal Transformers and Longitudinal Clinical Data
    Huynh, Justin
    Gonzalez, Ruben Cesar
    Walker, Evan
    Chuter, Benton Gabriel
    Kamalipour, Alireza
    Bowd, Christopher
    Belghith, Akram
    Goldbaum, Michael Henry
    Fazio, Massimo Antonio
    Girkin, Christopher A.
    De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo
    Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
    Weinreb, Robert
    Baxter, Sally Liu
    Zangwill, Linda M.
    Christopher, Mark
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [8] Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning
    Shuldiner, Scott R.
    Boland, Michael, V
    Ramulu, Pradeep Y.
    De Moraes, C. Gustavo
    Elze, Tobias
    Myers, Jonathan
    Pasquale, Louis
    Wellik, Sarah
    Yohannan, Jithin
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [9] Rates of visual field progression in clinical glaucoma care
    Heijl, Anders
    Buchholz, Patricia
    Norrgren, Gunilla
    Bengtsson, Boel
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91 (05) : 406 - 412
  • [10] Machine Learning for Prediction of Visual Field Progression
    Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros
    Mohammadzadeh, Vahid
    Rabiolo, Alessandro
    Caprioli, Joseph
    Yousefi, Siamak
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)