High flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure therapy in treatment of viral bronchiolitis: a randomized clinical trial

被引:41
|
作者
Vahlkvist, Signe [1 ,2 ]
Jurgensen, Louise [2 ]
La Cour, Amalie [1 ]
Markoew, Simone [1 ]
Petersen, Thomas Houmann [2 ]
Kofoed, Poul-Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp S w Jutland, Dept Pediat, Adolecent Med, Finsensgade 35, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
[2] Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Paediat, Adolescent Med, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
Bronchiolitis; CPAP; HFNC; Respiratory syncytial virus; Infants; POPULATION; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-019-03533-2
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been used in infants with bronchiolitis for decades. Recently, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy was introduced. We conducted a trial of 50 children with bronchiolitis who were randomized to treatment with CPAP or HFNC. Objectives were to compare the development in respiratory rate, pCO2, and Modified Woods Clinical Asthma Score (M-WCAS) in young children with bronchiolitis, treated with CPAP or HFNC. Secondarily, to compare Neonatal Infant Pain Score (NIPS), treatment duration, treatment failure, and hospitalization length. Median age at inclusion was 2.8 (CPAP group) vs 2.1 months (HFNC group). Mean baseline pCO2 was 6.7 in both groups and mean respiratory rate was 60 vs 56 in the CPAP and HFNC group respectively. No differences were observed in development of respiratory rate, pCO2, or M-WCAS. NIPS was higher in the CPAP group. Treatment failure was scarce in both groups. No significant differences in treatment duration or length of hospitalization were observed. Conclusion: In infants and young children with bronchiolitis, HFNC may be an effective and pleasant alternative to CPAP. Larger multicenter studies are needed to further explore differences in treatment failure and treatment duration. Trial registration: . id NCT02618213, registration date December 1, 2015.What is Known:center dot CPAP has been used for many years for respiratory support in infant bronchiolitis. The method requires special staff skills and may be stressful to the child.center dot HFNC has been introduced as a newer tool.What is New:center dot In infants with bronchiolitis, HFNC and CPAP were comparable in decreasing respiratory rate, pCO2, and need for oxygen supply.center dot Pain score during therapy was lower in the HFNC group.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 518
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure therapy in treatment of viral bronchiolitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Signe Vahlkvist
    Louise Jürgensen
    Amalie la Cour
    Simone Markoew
    Thomas Houmann Petersen
    Poul-Erik Kofoed
    [J]. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2020, 179 : 513 - 518
  • [2] High flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure and nasal positive pressure ventilation in infants with severe bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial
    Borgi, Aida
    Louati, Assaad
    Ghali, Narjess
    Hajji, Ahmed
    Ayari, Ahmed
    Bouziri, Asma
    Hssairi, Mohamed
    Menif, Khaled
    Benjaballah, Nejla
    [J]. PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 40
  • [3] High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Critical Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot
    Cesar, Regina Grigolli
    Bispo, Bibiane Ramos Pinheiro
    Felix, Priscilla Helena Costa Alves
    Modolo, Maria Carolina Caparica
    Souza, Andreia Aparecida Freitas
    Horigoshi, Nelson K.
    Rotta, Alexandre T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 09 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [4] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sandeep Narayan Lal
    Jaspreet Kaur
    Pooja Anthwal
    Kanika Goyal
    Pinky Bahl
    Jacob M. Puliyel
    [J]. Indian Pediatrics, 2018, 55 : 27 - 30
  • [5] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lal, Sandeep Narayan
    Kaur, Jaspreet
    Anthwal, Pooja
    Goyal, Kanika
    Bahl, Pinky
    Puliyel, Jacob M.
    [J]. INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2018, 55 (01) : 27 - 30
  • [6] Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula versus nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure during the management of severe bronchiolitis in infants: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Milesi, C.
    Essouri, S.
    Pouyau, R.
    Liet, J. M.
    Afanetti, M.
    Baleine, J.
    Durand, S.
    Cambonie, G.
    Breinig, S.
    Javouhey, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2016, 175 (11) : 1436 - 1436
  • [7] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High-Flow Nasal Cannula?
    Ramanathan, R.
    Biniwale, M.
    [J]. NEONATOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) : 268 - 269
  • [8] The infant with severe bronchiolitis: from high flow nasal cannula to continuous positive airway pressure and mechanical ventilation
    Wolfler, Andrea
    Raimondi, Gianfranco
    Pagan de Paganis, Cecilia
    Zoia, Elena
    [J]. MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2018, 70 (06) : 612 - 622
  • [9] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Today
    Dani, Carlo
    [J]. CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04) : 711 - 724
  • [10] Positive distending pressure generated by high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure
    Lampland, A.
    Plumm, B.
    Worwa, C.
    Meyers, P.
    Mammel, M. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 56 (01) : 140 - 141